IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v35y2003i1p56-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forms of Male Domination and Female Subordination: Homeworkers versus Maquiladora Workers in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Tamar Diana Wilson

    (Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-St. Louis)

Abstract

Much of what is labeled "patriarchy" in the literature on women's subordination is more accurately described as "neopatriarchy" and "phallocentrism." Neopatriarchy arises when the nuclear family replaces the extended family as the norm and the male head of household is designated as breadwinner. Phallocentrism appears when women challenge male economic domination by entering the labor force and become subordinated due primarily to their sexuality rather than due to their reproductive functions. It is argued that home-based women workers in Mexico are enmeshed in sometimes contested neopatriarchal relations, whereas maquiladora workers are in many cases "kept in place" through machismo phallocentrism on the part of managers, foremen, and male coworkers. In either case, capitalist enterprise gains a docile labor force.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamar Diana Wilson, 2003. "Forms of Male Domination and Female Subordination: Homeworkers versus Maquiladora Workers in Mexico," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 35(1), pages 56-72, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:35:y:2003:i:1:p:56-72
    DOI: 10.1177/0486613402250194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0486613402250194
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0486613402250194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Standing, Guy, 1989. "Global feminization through flexible labor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 17(7), pages 1077-1095, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Howes, Candace & Singh, Ajit, 1995. "Long-term trends in the World economy: The gender dimension," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(11), pages 1895-1911, November.
    2. Gunatilaka, Ramani., 2013. "To work or not to work? : Factors holding women back from market work in Sri Lanka," ILO Working Papers 994838403402676, International Labour Organization.
    3. Alan Gilbert, 1994. "Third World Cities: Poverty, Employment, Gender Roles and the Environment during a Time of Restructuring," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(4-5), pages 605-633, May.
    4. Floro, Maria Sagrario, 1995. "Economic restructuring, gender and the allocation of time," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(11), pages 1913-1929, November.
    5. Neetha N, 2010. "Women's Work in the Post Reform Period: An Exploration of Macro Data," Working Papers id:2885, eSocialSciences.
    6. Valentine M. Moghadam, 1994. "Market Reforms and Women Workers in Vietnam: A Case Study of Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1994-116, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Seguino, Stephanie, 2007. "Is more mobility good?: Firm mobility and the low wage-low productivity trap," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 27-51, March.
    8. Bussmann, Margit, 2009. "The Effect of Trade Openness on Women's Welfare and Work Life," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 1027-1038, June.
    9. T. Paul Schultz, 2006. "Does the Liberalization of Trade Advance Gender Equality in Schooling and Health?," Working Papers 935, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    10. Matthias Busse & Christian Spielmann, 2006. "Gender Inequality and Trade," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 362-379, August.
    11. Muhammad Shah, Saif, 2023. "Measuring women's freedom: introducing the women freedom index (WFI) for domestic empowerment and rights," MPRA Paper 117916, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Parrado, Emilio A., 2002. "Socioeconomic Context, Family Regimes, and Women's Early Labor Market Experience: The Case of Colombia and Venezuela," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 799-816, May.
    13. Stephanie Seguino & Caren Grown, 2006. "Gender equity and globalization: macroeconomic policy for developing countries," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(8), pages 1081-1104.
    14. Nitya Rao, 1996. "Empowerment through Organisation," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 3(2), pages 171-197, September.
    15. Erturk, Korkut & Darity, William Jr., 2000. "Secular Changes in the Gender Composition of Employment and Growth Dynamics in the North and the South," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1231-1238, July.
    16. Tamar Diana Wilson, 2020. "Precarization, Informalization, and Marx," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 470-486, September.
    17. Braunstein, Elissa, 2000. "Engendering Foreign Direct Investment: Family Structure, Labor Markets and International Capital Mobility," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1157-1172, July.
    18. Amaia Palencia-Esteban, 2019. "Occupational segregation of female and male immigrants in the European Union: accounting for cross-country differences," Working Papers 1905, Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Economía Aplicada.
    19. Sule Ozler, 2001. "Export Led Industrialization and Gender Differences in Job Creation and Destruction: Micro Evidence from The Turkish Manufacturing Sector," Working Papers 0116, Economic Research Forum, revised 06 2001.
    20. Dildar, Yasemin, 2015. "Patriarchal Norms, Religion, and Female Labor Supply: Evidence from Turkey," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 40-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:35:y:2003:i:1:p:56-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.