IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v34y2002i2p137-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Class, breadwinner ideology, and housework among Canadian husbands

Author

Listed:
  • M. R. Nakhaie

    (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Windsor, Windsor; Ont., Canada N9B 3P4; Tel.: +1-519-253-3000x3706; fax: +1-519-971-3621 nakhaie@uwindsor.ca)

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic discussion of class differences in housework and breadwinner ideology, and tests these relationships using a national sample of Canadian husbands. Analyses show that bourgeois males have a lower tendency to participate in housework than the managerial class or than working-class males whether unionized or not. Bourgeois males are also more likely to adhere to the breadwinner ideology than male managers and/or non-union workers. Other mechanisms such as the relative contribution of wife to the family income, husband's or wife's time availability, and/or husband's ideological orientations also effect housework. Housework is not, however, effected by ethnicity or immigration status. The implications of the findings for feminist theory are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • M. R. Nakhaie, 2002. "Class, breadwinner ideology, and housework among Canadian husbands," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 137-157, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:34:y:2002:i:2:p:137-157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rrp.sagepub.com/content/34/2/137.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Canada; Housework; Class;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:34:y:2002:i:2:p:137-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.