IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v4y1992i1p74-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game Theory Defined

Author

Listed:
  • ANATOL RAPOPORT

    (University of Toronto)

Abstract

A sharp distinction is made between normative and descriptive theories of decision. The former is purely deductive and thus can be regarded as belonging to a branch of mathematics. The results of a normative decision theory are not applicable to descriptions or predictions of how people will make decisions in given situations. Given a sufficiently precise definition of a “rational decision,†a normative theory can prescribe one in a given situation. Descriptive decision theory attempts to predict decisions of people in given situations sufficiently precisely described. In his critique of Prisoner's Dilemma, Aaron Wildavsky regards the theory underlying this game as a descriptive (or predictive) theory. For this reason, although his discussion calls attention to many interesting questions relating to people's decision behavior, his conclusions have no relevance to the theory of games.

Suggested Citation

  • Anatol Rapoport, 1992. "Game Theory Defined," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(1), pages 74-82, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:4:y:1992:i:1:p:74-82
    DOI: 10.1177/1043463192004001009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463192004001009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1043463192004001009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Glenn Stephens, 1994. "The Prisoners' Dilemma," Rationality and Society, , vol. 6(4), pages 520-524, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:4:y:1992:i:1:p:74-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.