IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v34y2022i3p302-333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a nuanced understanding of anti-immigration sentiment in the welfare state – a program specific analysis of welfare preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Diermeier

    (NRW School of Governance, University of Duisburg-Essen, German Economic Institute, Cologne, Germany)

  • Judith Niehues

    (German Economic Institute, Cologne, NW, Germany)

Abstract

The literature on immigration and the welfare state describes a trade-off between immigration and welfare support. We argue for a more nuanced view of welfare chauvinism that accounts for different motivational channels, specific welfare programs and particular population subgroups. First, we identify two separate characteristics of hostility towards immigrants that trigger welfare chauvinism: affective anti-migration sentiment that combines economic and cultural motives; and a ‘putative rational anti-migration sentiment’ that is driven by the fear that immigration could overburden the welfare state although immigrants themselves are not disliked or even appreciated. Second, running a program-specific analysis, we find that affective and ‘putative rational’ opposition to migration lower redistributive preferences towards the unemployed. On the contrary, affective anti-immigration sentiment even increases welfare affinity towards the elderly. We interpret this finding not as preferences for or against a specific welfare program but as implicit sympathy or antipathy for its recipients. Third, investigating the role of Populist Radical Right Parties (PRRPs) as the main source of welfare chauvinism, we find that PRRP supporters strongly prefer more redistribution towards a perceived native in-group: the elderly.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Diermeier & Judith Niehues, 2022. "Towards a nuanced understanding of anti-immigration sentiment in the welfare state – a program specific analysis of welfare preferences," Rationality and Society, , vol. 34(3), pages 302-333, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:34:y:2022:i:3:p:302-333
    DOI: 10.1177/10434631221093746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10434631221093746
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10434631221093746?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:34:y:2022:i:3:p:302-333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.