IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v31y2019i3p361-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reply to Wojtek Przepiorka: Testing goal-framing and hedonic hypocrisy

Author

Listed:
  • Siegwart Lindenberg

    (University of Groningen, The Netherlands; Tilburg University, The Netherlands)

  • Linda Steg

    (University of Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Marko Milovanovic

    (University of Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Anita Schipper

    (University of Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

It is always an honor when, after one publishes a study, somebody takes the time and effort to figure out how it could have been done better (Lindenberg et al., 2018; Przepiorka, 2019). It is a public service, and we are grateful for the effort. Although we are and remain quite proud of our studies and their results, there is, as in any study, always room for improvement and it is certainly important to test hypotheses also via other designs. However, we feel there are a number of misinterpretations, omissions, and confusions in Dr. Przepiorka’s comments, each of which we would like to discuss.

Suggested Citation

  • Siegwart Lindenberg & Linda Steg & Marko Milovanovic & Anita Schipper, 2019. "Reply to Wojtek Przepiorka: Testing goal-framing and hedonic hypocrisy," Rationality and Society, , vol. 31(3), pages 361-368, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:31:y:2019:i:3:p:361-368
    DOI: 10.1177/1043463119869080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463119869080
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1043463119869080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:31:y:2019:i:3:p:361-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.