IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v46y2018i3p486-513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wages, Informality, and Net Fiscal Benefit in a Federation

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Politi
  • Enlinson Mattos

Abstract

We estimate the net fiscal benefit (NFB) and the fiscal effect of unconditional grants on wages for twenty-six Brazilian states in the period 2005 to 2009. In particular, we explore the analytical framework proposed in Albouy to investigate the efficiency and equity effects of unconditional intergovernmental grants in Brazil. This framework can be understood as a positive exercise to comprehend whether grants mitigate the NFB differences across localities and whether they promote equalization in certain criteria. We explore labor market characteristics such as minimum wage and informality to evaluate efficiency and equity in grant distribution. According to our estimates, workers moving to more productive areas would obtain, on average, Brazilian Reais (BRL$) 0.52 less per year in NFBs on their earnings. Results suggest that unconditional grant policy in Brazil is associated with inefficiency because higher-paying areas with larger shares of formal jobs in metropolitan regions are negative recipients of grants.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Politi & Enlinson Mattos, 2018. "Wages, Informality, and Net Fiscal Benefit in a Federation," Public Finance Review, , vol. 46(3), pages 486-513, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:46:y:2018:i:3:p:486-513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pfr.sagepub.com/content/46/3/486.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:46:y:2018:i:3:p:486-513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.