IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/psydev/v25y2013i2p311-331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Somatic Referencing and Psychologisation in Emotion Narratives: A USA–Ghana Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Vivian A. Dzokoto
  • Annabella Opare-Henaku
  • Lily A. Kpobi

Abstract

Ameka (2002), Dzokoto and Okazaki (2006) and Guerts (2002) have observed a preponderance of somatic references in the communication of emotion in several spoken Ghanaian languages. This suggests that embodiment features prominently in Ghanaian cultural scripts of emotions. Unfortunately, the structure of English—Ghana’s official language due to its British colonial history—does not provide opportunities for somatic referencing in its emotion lexicon. How, then, do English-speaking Ghanaians express emotions, given the discrepancy between the cultural scripts and the structural limitations of the English emotion lexicon? To answer this question, 186 Ghanaian and181 American college students recalled what they considered one of their top ten most significant positive or negative emotional events, and indicated recalled physiological changes on a blank diagram of the human body. A subgroup of the larger sample provided written narratives about their most significant emotional event. Using thematic investigations and Linguistic Inquiry Word Count software, data analysis explored the nature of discourse about emotions in English, with particular focus on affective and embodied referents in the emotion narratives. Ghanaians reported fewer emotion words, but not more somatic words. The implications of the findings for somatisation are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivian A. Dzokoto & Annabella Opare-Henaku & Lily A. Kpobi, 2013. "Somatic Referencing and Psychologisation in Emotion Narratives: A USA–Ghana Comparison," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 25(2), pages 311-331, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:25:y:2013:i:2:p:311-331
    DOI: 10.1177/0971333613500875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971333613500875
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971333613500875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:25:y:2013:i:2:p:311-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.