IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/psydev/v24y2012i2p205-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who is an ‘Ideal’ Father? Father, Mother and Childrens’ Views

Author

Listed:
  • Rajalakshmi Sriram

    (M.S. University of Baroda, Baroda, Gujarat, India)

  • Prachee G. Navalkar

    (Freelance Researcher and Counsellor, Pune, India)

Abstract

The paper focuses on the constructions of the phrase—‘an ideal father’—by integrating findings from six different qualitative studies. Out of these six studies, five are from the city of Baroda while one is from Mumbai, both cities in western India. The total sample included 175 fathers, 50 mothers and 120 children. The studies used semi-structured interviews to elicit data from fathers and mothers about ‘who is an ideal father’? The study also sought children’s notions in the form of responses to open-ended statements. The data was analysed using themes from the generative-fathering framework (Dollahite, 2002; Dollahite and Hawkins, 1997). The results revealed that fathers were most influenced by their own parents in their ideals, followed by close relatives and other sources such as the media, mythology, friends and their respective spiritual gurus. The discussion focuses on understanding the results in terms of change and continuity in fatherhood ideals as well as the use of a generative framework for research on fatherhood.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajalakshmi Sriram & Prachee G. Navalkar, 2012. "Who is an ‘Ideal’ Father? Father, Mother and Childrens’ Views," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 24(2), pages 205-237, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:24:y:2012:i:2:p:205-237
    DOI: 10.1177/097133361202400206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097133361202400206
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097133361202400206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:24:y:2012:i:2:p:205-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.