IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v21y2021i2p196-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolving Social and Political Dialogue through Participatory Video Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Jayalaxshmi Mistry

    (Department of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, Surrey, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)

  • Jacqueline Shaw

    (Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Falmer, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)

Abstract

Spaces for social and political dialogue within communities and across social levels in inequitable contexts generally do not incorporate difference across community, or enable the most marginalized people to participate meaningfully. In this article, we propose that participatory video can contribute to building agonistic pluralism, namely a recognition of the unavoidable tensions between perspectives, and maintaining, rather than erasing, difference when working towards positive change. We draw on our comparable experience using participatory video methodologies to consider how it can be used to progressively build agency and deeper criticality, address difference across communities and to collectively construct political leverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayalaxshmi Mistry & Jacqueline Shaw, 2021. "Evolving Social and Political Dialogue through Participatory Video Processes," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 21(2), pages 196-213, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:21:y:2021:i:2:p:196-213
    DOI: 10.1177/14649934211016725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14649934211016725
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14649934211016725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soumyadip Chattopadhyay, 2015. "Contesting inclusiveness: Policies, politics and processes of participatory urban governance in Indian cities," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 15(1), pages 22-36, January.
    2. Green, Duncan, 2016. "How Change Happens," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198785392.
    3. Erene Kaptani & Nira Yuval-Davis, 2008. "Participatory Theatre as a Research Methodology: Identity, Performance and Social Action among Refugees," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zongxiang Wang & Tianhao Chen & Wei Li & Kai Zhang & Jianwu Qi, 2023. "Construction and Demonstration of the Evaluation System of Public Participation Level in Urban Planning Based on the Participatory Video of ‘General Will—Particular Will’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruth Mayne & Duncan Green & Irene Guijt & Martin Walsh & Richard English & Paul Cairney, 2018. "Using evidence to influence policy: Oxfam’s experience," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Bipashyee Ghosh & Saurabh Arora, 2022. "Smart as (un)democratic? The making of a smart city imaginary in Kolkata, India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 318-339, February.
    3. María Faciolince & Duncan Green, 2021. "One Door Opens: Another Door Shuts?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(2), pages 373-382, March.
    4. Nicola Andreij Rieg & Birgitta Gatersleben & Ian Christie, 2023. "Driving Change towards Sustainability in Public Bodies and Civil Society Organisations: Expert Interviews with UK Practitioners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Baskaran Venkatesh & R Velkennedy, 2023. "Formulation of citizen science approach for monitoring Sustainable Development Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation for an Indian city," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 56-66, February.
    6. Stephen Lauer & Matthew Sanderson, 2020. "Irrigated agriculture and human development: a county-level analysis 1980–2010," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4407-4423, June.
    7. Tara van Dijk & Amita Bhide & Vinay Shivtare, 2016. "When a participatory slum sanitation project encounters urban informality: The case of the Greater Mumbai Metropolitan Region," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 19(1), pages 45-59, March.
    8. Fox, Jonathan, 2020. "Contested terrain: International development projects and countervailing power for the excluded," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. World Bank, 2018. "World Development Report 2018 [Rapport sur le développement dans le monde 2018]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 28340.
    10. Jackie Shaw & Mary Wickenden & Stephen Thompson & Philip Mader, 2022. "Achieving disability inclusive employment – Are the current approaches deep enough?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(5), pages 942-963, July.
    11. Steven R. Smith & Ian Christie, 2021. "Knowledge Integration in the Politics and Policy of Rapid Transitions to Net Zero Carbon: A Typology and Mapping Method for Climate Actors in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Mason, Mark & Crossley, Michael & Bond, Tim, 2019. "Changing modalities in international development and research in education: Conceptual and ethical issues," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Nalita James, 2013. "Research on the ‘Inside’: The Challenges of Conducting Research with Young Offenders," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(4), pages 138-147, November.
    14. Margit Van Wessel & Dorothea Hilhorst & Lau Schulpen & Kees Biekart, 2020. "Government and civil society organizations: Close but comfortable? Lessons from creating the Dutch “Strategic Partnerships for Lobby and Advocacy”," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(6), pages 728-746, November.
    15. Victoria Austin & Cathy Holloway & Ignacia Ossul Vermehren & Abs Dumbuya & Giulia Barbareschi & Julian Walker, 2021. "“Give Us the Chance to Be Part of You, We Want Our Voices to Be Heard”: Assistive Technology as a Mediator of Participation in (Formal and Informal) Citizenship Activities for Persons with Disabilitie," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-30, May.
    16. Logan Cochrane, 2017. "Stages of food security: A co-produced mixed-methods methodology," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 17(4), pages 291-306, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:21:y:2021:i:2:p:196-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.