IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v1y2001i1p5-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The global politics of development: towards a new research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Payne

    (Department of Politics, Elmfield, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

Abstract

New ways are needed of framing the international politics of development in the context of global restructuring. The old thinking that employed such terms as ‘Third World’, ‘developing countries’, ‘core and periphery’, even ‘North’ and ‘South’ needs to be abandoned. It does not travel well into a globalizing world. New interpretations of international inequality emerged in the 1990s - the so-called ‘Bretton Woods’ and ‘United Nations’ paradigms - and are linked to attendant economic liberal and sociological strands of political economy analysis. But both approaches underplay politics. However, the new global politics of development can be satisfactorily framed, provided that we adopt an approach that takes globalization seriously, recognizes the continuing, albeit changing, realities of states and interstate politics and reinterprets development as a universal problem. Attempts to classify states and societies in advance of research must also be avoided.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Payne, 2001. "The global politics of development: towards a new research agenda," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 1(1), pages 5-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:1:y:2001:i:1:p:5-19
    DOI: 10.1177/146499340100100102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/146499340100100102
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/146499340100100102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Booth, David, 1985. "Marxism and development sociology: Interpreting the impasse," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 13(7), pages 761-787, July.
    2. World Bank, 1995. "Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries 1995," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 32390.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brahmbhatt, Milan & Srinivasan, T.G. & Murrell, Kim, 1996. "India in the global economy," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1681, The World Bank.
    2. Bernard Hoekman & Carlos Braga, 1997. "Protection and Trade in Services: A Survey," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 285-308, July.
    3. Ng, Francis & Yeats, Alexander, 1997. "Open economies work better! did Africa's protectionist policies cause its marginalization in world trade?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 889-904, June.
    4. David Booth, 2003. "Patterns of difference and practical theory: researching the new poverty strategy processes in Africa," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(7), pages 863-877.
    5. Murat Arsel & Murat Arsel & Anirban Dasgupta, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 644-665, July.
    6. Peter Vandergeest, 1991. "Gifts and Rights: Cautionary Notes on Community Self‐help in Thailand," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 22(3), pages 421-443, July.
    7. David Hulme, 1987. "State‐sponsored Land Settlement Policies: Theory and Practice," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 413-436, July.
    8. Cristóbal Kay, 1991. "Reflections on the Latin American Contribution to Development Theory," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 22(1), pages 31-68, January.
    9. Stephenson, Sherry M., 1999. "Approaches to liberalizing services," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2107, The World Bank.
    10. Andy Sumner, 2019. "Global Poverty and Inequality: Change and Continuity in Late Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(2), pages 410-425, March.
    11. Willie Tan, 2002. "Construction and economic development in selected LDCs: past, present and future," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 593-599.
    12. Frederick Nixson, 2006. "Rethinking the political economy of development: back to basics and beyond," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(7), pages 967-981.
    13. Merle Holden, 2000. "Openness, the Terms of Trade and Trade Policy in Natural Resource Economies," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 68(2), pages 125-131, June.
    14. Grabel, Ilene, 1996. "Marketing the third world: The contradictions of portfolio investment in the global economy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(11), pages 1761-1776, November.
    15. L A Brown & R Sierra & D Southgate & L Labao, 1992. "Complementary Perspectives as a Means of Understanding Regional Change: Frontier Settlement in the Ecuador Amazon," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(7), pages 939-961, July.
    16. David Goldsworthy, 1988. "Thinking Politically about Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 19(3), pages 505-530, July.
    17. Polly Stupples, 2014. "Creative contributions: The role of the arts and the cultural sector in development," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 14(2), pages 115-130, April.
    18. Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven, 2021. "Beyond the Stereotype: Restating the Relevance of the Dependency Research Programme," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(1), pages 76-112, January.
    19. Jamshed Y. Uppal & I.U. Mangla, 1996. "Accessing International Capital: Pakistan’s Experience, Prospects, and Policy Implications," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 929-941.
    20. Boyboy Motloung & Ronald Mears, 2002. "Combating poverty in South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 531-543.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:1:y:2001:i:1:p:5-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.