IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v15y2015i3p270-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy paradigms, subnational governance and the state sovereignty gap in Afghanistan

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Blunt

    (Centre for Organizations in Development, School of Environment Education and Development, University of Manchester, England)

  • Farid Mamundzay

    (Independent Directorate of Local Governance Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan)

  • Nader Yama

    (Independent Directorate of Local Governance Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan)

  • Hamidullah Afghan

    (Independent Directorate of Local Governance Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan)

Abstract

It is argued that the battle to restore the sovereignty of the Afghan state will be won or lost subnationally. Victory will be more likely if, following Ghani and Lockhart (2008), citizen security can be assured; if the rule of law can be upheld without fear or favour; if reasonably effective, merit-based and accountable leadership and administrative means for service delivery can be institutionalized; and if social policies can be implemented which cut across regions and ethnic groups. However, progress towards these ambitious ends and the introduction in its support of pragmatic, evidence-based policy to strengthen the existing deconcentrated system of subnational governance (SNG) are hampered by stakeholder conceptual confusion about SNG, questionable donor altruism and largely incommensurable and irreconcilable SNG policy paradigms. Success will depend on whether links can be forged between SNG pragmatic imperatives and political expediency and on perceptions of policy compatibility with democracy promotion.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Blunt & Farid Mamundzay & Nader Yama & Hamidullah Afghan, 2015. "Policy paradigms, subnational governance and the state sovereignty gap in Afghanistan," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 15(3), pages 270-285, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:15:y:2015:i:3:p:270-285
    DOI: 10.1177/1464993415578981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1464993415578981
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1464993415578981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:15:y:2015:i:3:p:270-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.