IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v24y2025i1p72-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equal and ashamed? Egalitarianism, anti-discrimination, and redistribution

Author

Listed:
  • Bastian Steuwer

Abstract

One prominent criticism of luck egalitarianism is that it requires either shameful revelations or otherwise problematic declarations by the state toward those who have had bad brute luck. Relational egalitarianism, by contrast, is portrayed as an alternative that requires no such revelations or declarations. I argue that this is false. Relational equality requires the state to draft anti-discrimination laws for both state and private action. The ideal of relational egalitarianism requires these laws to be asymmetric, that is to allow affirmative action for disadvantaged groups while prohibiting affirmative action for advantaged groups. Hence, the state needs to make a public declaration on which groups are privileged and which are underprivileged; and individuals need to reveal whether they belong to groups officially declared underprivileged. These declarations are no more problematic in this case than in the case of luck egalitarianism.

Suggested Citation

  • Bastian Steuwer, 2025. "Equal and ashamed? Egalitarianism, anti-discrimination, and redistribution," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 24(1), pages 72-97, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:72-97
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X241259183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X241259183
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X241259183?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:72-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.