IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v24y2025i1p51-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The distinctiveness of relational equality

Author

Listed:
  • Devon Cass

Abstract

In recent years, a distinction between two concepts of equality has been much discussed: “distributive†equality involves people having equal amounts of a good such as welfare or resources, and “social†or “relational†equality involves the absence of (certain kinds of) social hierarchy and the presence of (certain kinds of) equal social relations. This contrast is commonly thought to have important implications for our understanding of the relationship between equality and justice. But the nature and significance of the distinction is far from clear. I examine several accounts of this issue and argue none are entirely satisfactory. In turn, I offer an alternative proposal. Relational equality, on my account, involves a concern with each person having an equal “civic status.†I characterize this concern and show it has distinctive and normatively significant positional and temporal aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Devon Cass, 2025. "The distinctiveness of relational equality," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 24(1), pages 51-71, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:51-71
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X241251389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X241251389
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X241251389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:51-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.