IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v23y2024i3p273-294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What makes communism possible? The self-realisation interpretation

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Kandiyali

Abstract

In the Critique of Gotha Programme , Karl Marx famously argues that a communist society will be characterised by the principle, ‘From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs!’ I take up a question about this principle that was originally posed by G.A. Cohen , namely: what makes communism (so conceived) possible for Marx? In reply to this question, Cohen interprets Marx as saying that communism is possible because of limitless abundance, a view that Cohen takes to be implausible for ecological reasons. I develop a new interpretation of Marx's position. On this interpretation, people in communist society achieve self-realisation through providing others with the goods and services required for their self-realisation. Coupled with a reasonably high (but not immense) development of productive power, self-realisation generates conditions in which people can produce according to their abilities and receive according to their needs. I defend this view as an interpretation of Marx and I argue that it represents a more plausible account of what makes communism possible than Cohen's interpretation in which technological advance and limitless abundance play the predominant role.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Kandiyali, 2024. "What makes communism possible? The self-realisation interpretation," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(3), pages 273-294, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:3:p:273-294
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X231219764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X231219764
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X231219764?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John E. Roemer, 1994. "A Future for Socialism," Politics & Society, , vol. 22(4), pages 451-478, December.
    2. Jens Jørund Tyssedal, 2023. "Good work: The importance of caring about making a social contribution," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 22(2), pages 177-196, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naoki Yoshihara & Roberto Veneziani, 2009. "Exploitation as the Unequal Exchange of Labour: An Axiomatic Approach," Working Papers 655, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    2. Gaetano Cuomo, 2011. "NOTE BIBLIOGRAFICHE: JOSSA B. (2010), Esiste un'alternativa al capitalismo? L'impresa democratica e l'attualitá del marxismo, Manifestolibri, Roma," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 64(254), pages 177-180.
    3. Costas Panayotakis, 2012. "Scarcity, capitalism and the promise of economic democracy," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 104-111.
    4. Christopher Wonnell, 1998. "Roemer and Market Socialism," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1), pages 37-46.
    5. Gaetano Cuomo, 2015. "Imprese cooperative e democrazia economica," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(116), pages 5-38.
    6. H. E. Frech & Peter Zweifel, 2017. "Market Socialism and Community Rating in Health Insurance," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 59(3), pages 405-427, September.
    7. Douglas W MacKenzie, 2018. "Social Dividends, Entrepreneurial Discretion, and Bureaucratic Rules," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 44(1), pages 30-48, January.
    8. Kaushik Basu, 2016. "Beyond the Invisible Hand: Groundwork for a New Economics," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9299.
    9. Benoît Walraevens, 2023. "Ideologies and Utopia: A Ricoeurian Reading of Thomas Piketty," Post-Print hal-04195650, HAL.
    10. Sujian Guo & Gary A. Stradiotto, 2007. "The Nature and Direction of Economic Reform in North Korea," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(4), pages 754-778, December.
    11. François Facchini & Mickael Melki, 2021. "Egalitarianism and the democratic deconsolidation: Is democracy compatible with socialism?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 447-465, March.
    12. Emilio Carnevali & André Pedersen Ystehede, 2023. "Is socialism back? A review of contemporary economic literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 239-270, April.
    13. James Yunker, 2007. "A Comprehensive Incentives Analysis of the Potential Performance of Market Socialism," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 81-113.
    14. Petersen, Thomas & Faber, Malte, 2012. "Karl Marx: Herakles oder Sisyphos?Eine philosophische und ökonomische Untersuchung," Working Papers 0520, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    15. Spagat, M., 1995. "Leaving some stones unturned: A reassessment of iterative planning theory," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 85-105, September.
    16. Robin Hahnel, 2017. "Wanted: A Pollution Damage Revealing Mechanism," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 49(2), pages 233-246, June.
    17. Anthony Evans, 2010. "Austrian economics behind the iron curtain: The rebirth of an intellectual tradition," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 243-268, September.
    18. Papagiannaki, Eleni & Philp, Bruce & Arntsen, Alexandra, 2020. "Social or Economic Class? False Dichotomies, Reductionism and Abstract Categories," CAFE Working Papers 2, Centre for Accountancy, Finance and Economics (CAFE), Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University.
    19. Flaschel, Peter & Greiner, Alfred, 2012. "Flexicurity Capitalism: Foundations, Problems, and Perspectives," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199751587.
    20. Juan Camilo Cárdenas, 2005. "Local Commons and Cross-Effects of Population and Inequality on the Local Provision of environmental Services," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 62, pages 75-121, Enero-Jun.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:3:p:273-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.