IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v23y2024i3p252-272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social equality and the conditional justifiability of political inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Takuto Kobayashi

Abstract

Social or relational egalitarians try to defend democracy non-instrumentally as a constitutive element of a society where no one stands as inferior or superior to anyone else. However, they face an instrumentalist challenge from within: Why not uphold a non-democratic regime if it outperforms democracy in protecting or promoting egalitarian social relations, for example, by stably producing substantive political decisions that guard against social hierarchies? This article explores the best response to this challenge from the social egalitarian non-instrumentalist standpoint. It argues that the instrumentalist challenge can be accommodated without abandoning the essential non-instrumentalist commitment to democracy; while a nondemocratic regime may be justified under less-than-ideal circumstances as a contingently effective means to realize more social equality, democracy can nevertheless be viewed as a necessary condition for the realization of full social equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Takuto Kobayashi, 2024. "Social equality and the conditional justifiability of political inequality," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(3), pages 252-272, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:3:p:252-272
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X231215782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X231215782
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X231215782?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ingham, Sean, 2022. "Representative Democracy and Social Equality," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 116(2), pages 689-701, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:3:p:252-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.