IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v12y2013i3p219-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freedom, self-ownership, and equality in Steiner’s left-libertarianism

Author

Listed:
  • Ronen Shnayderman

Abstract

Hillel Steiner’s left-libertarian theory of justice is the most serious recent attempt to reconcile the ideals of (luck-egalitarian) equality and freedom. This attempt consists in an argument that a universal right to equal freedom, which in Steiner’s view means also a universal right to maximal freedom, implies a universal right to self-ownership and to an egalitarian share of the world’s natural resources. In this article, I argue that this argument fails on Steiner’s own terms. I argue that, on Steiner’s conceptions of freedom, self-ownership, and an egalitarian share of the world’s natural resources, insofar as the right to equal freedom implies the right to self-ownership and to an egalitarian share of the world’s natural resources, it is incompatible with (luck-egalitarian) equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronen Shnayderman, 2013. "Freedom, self-ownership, and equality in Steiner’s left-libertarianism," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 12(3), pages 219-227, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:12:y:2013:i:3:p:219-227
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X12460638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X12460638
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X12460638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:12:y:2013:i:3:p:219-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.