IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v53y2025i1p57-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Façade Fictions: False Statistics and Spheres of Autonomy in Meiji Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Fabian Drixler

    (Yale University)

  • Reo Matsuzaki

    (Trinity College)

Abstract

Around 1900, at least 97 percent of homicide victims in Japan were newborn children. Official statistics obscured this fact by reporting only a handful of infanticides each year, but they also preserved it in the guise of impossibly frequent stillbirths. We argue that this striking failure of law enforcement did not reflect insufficient state capacity. The statistics are best understood as the result of a performance, jointly delivered by subjects and officials to reconcile two conflicting values—the omote (façade) of the state's legal protection of newborns and the naishŠ(tacit arrangement) of household autonomy over family planning and reproduction. Political performances are often seen as deployed by those in power to deceive, discipline, or dominate the population. We observe instead a more collaborative dynamic that allows states to extend their reach into society while also respecting the autonomy of the population through compromise and indeterminacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabian Drixler & Reo Matsuzaki, 2025. "Façade Fictions: False Statistics and Spheres of Autonomy in Meiji Japan," Politics & Society, , vol. 53(1), pages 57-97, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:53:y:2025:i:1:p:57-97
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292241253135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292241253135
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292241253135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:53:y:2025:i:1:p:57-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.