IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v50y2022i3p455-484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suppression by Stealth: The Partisan Response to Protest in State Legislatures

Author

Listed:
  • Chan S. Suh

    (Chung-Ang University)

  • Sidney G. Tarrow

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

Many scholars have investigated the relationship between protest and repression. Less often examined is the legislative suppression of protest by elites seeking to make protest more costly to protesters. Because state legislatures are largely invisible to the public, this “wholesale†suppression of protest is less likely to trigger public opposition than repression by the police. This study explains the sharp increase in the number and the severity of state legislative bills to repress the right to protest both before and after the election of Donald Trump. In particular, it examines whether these can be attributed either to Republican control of state legislatures or to protest threat. Contrary to the findings in much of the literature, bills aimed at suppressing protest are less closely related to threat than to the realignment of state politics. The article also finds that these proposals were influenced by diffusion through policy brokerage.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan S. Suh & Sidney G. Tarrow, 2022. "Suppression by Stealth: The Partisan Response to Protest in State Legislatures," Politics & Society, , vol. 50(3), pages 455-484, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:50:y:2022:i:3:p:455-484
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292211039956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292211039956
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292211039956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:50:y:2022:i:3:p:455-484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.