IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v49y2021i1p75-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Comparative Political Economy of Growth Models: Explaining the Continuity of FDI-Led Growth in Ireland and Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Dorothee Bohle

    (European University Institute, Florence)

  • Aidan Regan

    (University College Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

This article argues that the quiet politics of informal business-state interaction explains the political determinants of growth regimes. Building on the business power literature within the study of comparative capitalism, it shows that the noisy politics of elections often leads to changes of government but rarely to fundamental changes in the growth regime. Rather, growth models can be traced to the interactions and interests of dominant corporations within a country and its policymaking elites. The argument is developed through a comparative case study research design, using the case of foreign direct investment–led (FDI-led) growth in Ireland and Hungary. FDI-led growth regimes are a universe of cases that rely on state-led industrial and enterprise policies targeting the capital investment of foreign-owned multinational firms. Despite periods of noisy electoral politics challenging basic tenets of the FDI-led growth model in both Hungary and Ireland, the continuity of FDI-oriented growth is traced to the corporate politics of business-state elite deals.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorothee Bohle & Aidan Regan, 2021. "The Comparative Political Economy of Growth Models: Explaining the Continuity of FDI-Led Growth in Ireland and Hungary," Politics & Society, , vol. 49(1), pages 75-106, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:49:y:2021:i:1:p:75-106
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329220985723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329220985723
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329220985723?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dorottya Sallai & Gerhard Schnyder & Daniel Kinderman & Andreas Nölke, 2024. "The antecedents of MNC political risk and uncertainty under right-wing populist governments," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 41-63, March.
    2. Aneta Bobenič Hintošová & Glória Bódy, 2023. "Sustainable FDI in the Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Renato H. de Gaspi & Pedro Perfeito da Silva, 2024. "The Sectoral Politics of Industrial Policy Making in Brazil: A Polanyian Interpretation," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(3), pages 398-428, May.
    4. Sallai, Dorottya & Schnyder, Gerhard & Kinderman, Daniel & Nölke, Andreas, 2023. "The antecedents of MNC political risk and uncertainty under right-wing populist governments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118668, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Kühnast, Julia, 2022. "Growth regimes of populist governments: A comparative study on Hungary and Poland," IPE Working Papers 199/2022, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    6. Woodgate, Ryan, 2021. "Multinational corporations and commercialised states: Can state aid serve as the basis for an FDI-driven growth strategy?," IPE Working Papers 161/2021, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    7. Hartwell, Christopher A. & Devinney, Timothy M., 2024. "The demands of populism on business and the creation of “corporate political obligations”," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:49:y:2021:i:1:p:75-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.