IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v48y2020i3p357-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics, Social and Economic Change, and Crime: Exploring the Impact of Contextual Effects on Offending Trajectories

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Farrall
  • Emily Gray
  • Phil Mike Jones

Abstract

Do government policies increase the likelihood that some citizens will become persistent criminals? Using criminological concepts such as the idea of a “criminal career†and sociological concepts such as the life course, this article assesses the outcome of macro-level economic policies on individuals’ engagement in crime. Few studies in political science, sociology, or criminology directly link macroeconomic policies to individual offending. Employing individual-level longitudinal data, this article tracks a sample of Britons born in 1970 from childhood to adulthood and examines their offending trajectories through the early 1980s to see the effects of economic policies on individuals’ repeated offending. A model is developed with data from the British 1970 Birth Cohort Study that incorporates individuals, families, and schools and takes account of national-level economic policies (driven by New Right political ideas). Findings suggest that economic restructuring was a key causal factor in offending during the period. Criminologists are encouraged to draw on ideas from political science to help explain offending careers and show how political choices in the management of the economy encourage individual-level responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Farrall & Emily Gray & Phil Mike Jones, 2020. "Politics, Social and Economic Change, and Crime: Exploring the Impact of Contextual Effects on Offending Trajectories," Politics & Society, , vol. 48(3), pages 357-388, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:48:y:2020:i:3:p:357-388
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329220942395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329220942395
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329220942395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Nunn & Daniela Tepe, 2022. "Disciplinary Neo-Liberalisation and the New Politics of Inequality," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(5), pages 1305-1322.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:48:y:2020:i:3:p:357-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.