IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v42y2014i1p73-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symbolic Politics and the Regulation of Executive Compensation

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra L. Suárez

Abstract

When politicians feel popular pressure to act, but are unwilling or unable to address the root cause of the problem, they resort to symbolic policymaking. In this paper, I examine excessive executive compensation as an issue that rose to the top of the political agenda during both the Great Depression and the Great Recession. Presidential candidates, members of Congress, the media, and the public alike blamed corporate greed for the economic downturn. In both instances, however, enacted legislation stopped short of changing the way in which executive pay was determined or placing effective, enforceable limits on it. I analyze the nature of the democratic process and contend that public policy scholars need to pay more attention to the occurrence of symbolic policies. The category of symbolic policies offers a more accurate approach to understanding the politics of executive compensation in the United States during the two crises and helps explain why, in spite of the recent legislative efforts, it continues to rise.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra L. Suárez, 2014. "Symbolic Politics and the Regulation of Executive Compensation," Politics & Society, , vol. 42(1), pages 73-105, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:42:y:2014:i:1:p:73-105
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329213512980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329213512980
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329213512980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:42:y:2014:i:1:p:73-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.