IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v38y2010i3p287-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Class as a Normative Category: Egalitarian Reasons to Take It Seriously (With a South African Case Study)

Author

Listed:
  • Daryl Glaser

    (University of Witwatersrand, Republic of South Africa, daryl.glaser@wits.ac.za)

Abstract

Race and sex/gender are commonly argued to deserve equal priority with class oppression in egalitarian politics. However, placing race and sex in the same list as what is here termed “standard-of-living class†constitutes a category error. Standard of living, alongside power and status, belongs to a distinctive list of “metrics of hierarchy†that should be accorded priority in an important respect: in the specification of the hierarchies (or “distribution strata†) that egalitarians seek ultimately to eliminate or reduce. Race and sex, along with other “differentiators,†matter primarily for the way they are “used†by social arrangements (e.g., apartheid, patriarchy, capitalism) to assign persons to places in hierarchies of living standard, power, and status. Examining policies to promote black capitalism in post-apartheid South Africa, the author shows how the conflation of differentiators (race, in this case) and distribution strata (like standard-of-living class) is complicit in justifying multiracialized inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Daryl Glaser, 2010. "Class as a Normative Category: Egalitarian Reasons to Take It Seriously (With a South African Case Study)," Politics & Society, , vol. 38(3), pages 287-309, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:38:y:2010:i:3:p:287-309
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329210373068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329210373068
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329210373068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:38:y:2010:i:3:p:287-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.