IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v27y1999i3p403-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax Competition in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • VIVEK H. DEHEJIA
  • PHILIPP GENSCHEL

Abstract

Tax competition poses two problems for international cooperation: defection and distributive conflict. Multilateral cooperation to stop tax competition may fail because states face incentives to renege on their promises or because they face adverse distributional consequences, either of which makes cooperation an unattractive option for them. Conventional wisdom in international relations concentrates on the first problem, highlighting that the problem of tax competition resembles a Prisoner's dilemma. We argue instead that it is the peculiar distributional consequences of tax competition which explain why all attempts to regulate it cooperatively have failed. Combining theoretical analysis with empirical research on the European Union's unsuccessful record of tax cooperation, we show how distributive, within-group conflict amongst potential cooperators interacts with the constraints imposed by a non-cooperating outside world to make multilateral tax cooperation an especially elusive goal for international collaboration.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Vivek H. Dehejia & Philipp Genschel, 1999. "Tax Competition in the European Union," Politics & Society, , vol. 27(3), pages 403-430, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:27:y:1999:i:3:p:403-430
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329299027003005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329299027003005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329299027003005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:27:y:1999:i:3:p:403-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.