IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/padigm/v9y2005i1p93-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the IT Paradox

Author

Listed:
  • UG Singh

Abstract

In this paper, the paradoxical situation that appears to exist between IT Educators and their apparent lack of use of Educational Technology tools at university IT departments in South Africa, is investigated. In previous research (Blewett & Singh, 2003) it was found that only 16% of IT academics, at universities, were making significant use of Educational Technology tools. It was also noted that 32% of the IT academics surveyed felt that the use of technology was not more effective than traditional methods of teaching. This paper now presents the results of further research that was conducted, in an attempt to investigate this paradoxical situation. The survey reveals that there are 5 key factors hindering the usage of Educational Technology tools by University IT departments in South Africa: 1. Resistance to changing traditional teaching practices 2. Increased time commitment (workload) for academic staff 3. Academic staff have not been taught how to apply technology in teaching 4. Inadequate infrastructure for access, support and training to sustain technology 5. Lack of coordinated planning for technology at departmental, institutional and systems levels. Although identifying these key inhibitors, the paradox deepens further when Resistance to Change is considered as the number 1 inhibitor. Further to this is the apparent belief by IT academics that their limited use of basic Educational Technology Tools (Type 1 Tools) constitutes the use and application of Educational Technology.

Suggested Citation

  • UG Singh, 2005. "Investigating the IT Paradox," Paradigm, , vol. 9(1), pages 93-97, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:9:y:2005:i:1:p:93-97
    DOI: 10.1177/0971890720050114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971890720050114
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971890720050114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:9:y:2005:i:1:p:93-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.