IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/millen/v6y2015i1p61-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing China’s Contested Borderland Regions: Xinjiang and Tibet

Author

Listed:
  • Kunal Mukherjee

Abstract

This article looks at the political situation in China’s contested borderland regions with a special focus on Xinjiang and Tibet from 1949, which is when the People’s Republic of China (PRC) came into existence, till more recent times. The article looks at the nature of the conflict in these two disputed borderland regions of China, how the conflicts have changed their identity with the passage of time and the state policies that have been directed at these two regions to deal with the conflict. The article makes use of the ‘new war’ thesis as a theoretical framework. To understand the political situation in these remote peripheral regions of China, one needs to pay close attention to the interaction or more correctly to the clash between religious identity and Chinese high handedness and brutality. Both regions are deeply religious: Xinjiang has a strong Muslim presence and Tibet has a strong Buddhist presence, which the Chinese state has always found threatening and difficult to deal with, since religious elements in Chinese society are perceived as subversive. Finally, the article takes a comparative approach and looks at areas of similarity and differences between Xinjiang and Tibet.

Suggested Citation

  • Kunal Mukherjee, 2015. "Comparing China’s Contested Borderland Regions: Xinjiang and Tibet," Millennial Asia, , vol. 6(1), pages 61-80, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:millen:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:61-80
    DOI: 10.1177/0976399614563225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0976399614563225
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0976399614563225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:millen:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:61-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.