IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/miceco/v12y2024i1p93-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighty Evidence? Poverty Estimation with Missing Data

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Drèze
  • Anmol Somanchi

Abstract

Attempts have been made to estimate poverty in India using a biased dataset, by adjusting household weights to remove or reduce the bias. The effectiveness of this method, however, is uncertain. Simulation exercises suggest that its ability to correct poverty estimates varies wildly depending on the nature of the underlying bias, which may be hard to guess—there lies the rub. When the bias changes over time, estimating poverty trends becomes truly problematic. There are wider lessons for poverty estimation with biased or missing data. JEL Classifications: C83, I32

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Drèze & Anmol Somanchi, 2024. "Weighty Evidence? Poverty Estimation with Missing Data," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 12(1), pages 93-106, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:miceco:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:93-106
    DOI: 10.1177/23210222241238846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23210222241238846
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23210222241238846?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    India; poverty estimation; missing data; max-entropy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:miceco:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:93-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.