IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/metjou/v23y2024i2p103-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientific Mapping of Audit Committee: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ragubir Sahu
  • Rajat Deb

Abstract

The audit committee (AC) literature has witnessed significant growth and evolution leading to ongoing debates and controversies surrounding the functions of ACs. The study uses bibliometric analysis (scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews protocol) to create a scientific map of ACs using 922 papers from the Web of Science database from 1998 to 2022. The analysis uses specialized tools like Biblioshiny and VOSviewer for performance analysis and academic mapping. The results show that particularly AC is a dynamic area of study, with the United States having the highest number of publications and the United Kingdom being the most influential contributor. The cluster analysis of bibliographic connections reveals prominent themes in the document, and the authors reveal that corporate governance, AC, directorship, board composition, firm performance, and earning management themes are in trend and individual ACs’ functions have been less explored. JEL Classification: M41, M42

Suggested Citation

  • Ragubir Sahu & Rajat Deb, 2024. "Scientific Mapping of Audit Committee: A Bibliometric Analysis," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 23(2), pages 103-116, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:23:y:2024:i:2:p:103-116
    DOI: 10.1177/09726225241257729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09726225241257729
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09726225241257729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Audit committee; corporate governance; bibliometric analysis; co-author analysis; and co-word analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:23:y:2024:i:2:p:103-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.