IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v9y1989i4p225-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The High Cost and Low Efficacy of Weekly Viral Cultures for Pregnant Women with Recurrent Genital Herpes

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy J. Binkin
  • Jeffrey P. Koplan

Abstract

The use of weekly cultures to prevent neonatal infection among infants of pregnant women who have histories of genital herpes has been controversial since a decision analysis study in 1983 suggested that this strategy was not cost-effective and would avert relatively few cases of neonatal herpes simplex virus infection. Using more recent and better data, the authors reanalyzed this approach to reducing neonatal herpes infection. The reanalysis revealed that a national screening program would prevent only 1.8 cases of neonatal herpes in the United States annually, at a cost of more than 37 million dollars per case averted. The program would cost nearly 7 million dollars per quality-adjusted life year gained when only infant deaths are taken into consideration. When maternal deaths from excess cesarean deliveries are taken into account, over 44 million dollars would be spent for every quality- adjusted life-year gained. On the basis of the strategy's limited benefits and low cost- effectiveness, the authors support the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology's position of abandoning the recommendation for weekly prenatal herpes cultures. Key words: herpes; neonatal; screening; cost-effectiveness. (Med Decis Making 1989;9:225-230)

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy J. Binkin & Jeffrey P. Koplan, 1989. "The High Cost and Low Efficacy of Weekly Viral Cultures for Pregnant Women with Recurrent Genital Herpes," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 9(4), pages 225-230, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:9:y:1989:i:4:p:225-230
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8900900401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X8900900401
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X8900900401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kimberly M. Thompson & Maria Seguiā€Gomez & John D. Graham, 2002. "Validating Benefit and Cost Estimates: The Case of Airbag Regulation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 803-811, August.
    2. Lisa Prosser & James Hammitt & Ron Keren, 2007. "Measuring Health Preferences for Use in Cost-Utility and Cost-Benefit Analyses of Interventions in Children," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 713-726, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:9:y:1989:i:4:p:225-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.