IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v9y1989i1p59-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Women's Health Trial as an Investment

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole Urban
  • Mary Baker

Abstract

The Women's Health Trial (WHT), a large, multi-unit randomized controlled trial, would have cost a total of $130 million to test the hypothesis that a 50% reduction in the percentage of calories from dietary fat would yield a detectable reduction in breast cancer incidence. However, the WHT was discontinued because evidence to support the hypothesized rela tionship between dietary fat and breast cancer was judged insufficient to justify the trial. The analysis presented here was undertaken in order to contribute an economic perspective on this issue. Principles of decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis are employed to obtain a preliminary estimate of the expected cost per year of life saved of the WHT, as a function of the prior probability that the hypothesis is true (PRIOR). Under specified base- case assumptions, the estimated expected costs per year of life saved range from $11,900 when PRIOR is assumed to be 0.9 to $25,615 when PRIOR is assumed to be 0.1. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the results are most sensitive to assumptions about the strength of the relationship between dietary fat and breast cancer risk, and that cost-effectiveness is improved when it is assumed that dietary change can be achieved by an inexpensive in tervention. The expected cost-effectiveness of the WHT is well within the range of estimates of cost-effectiveness of other disease prevention interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole Urban & Mary Baker, 1989. "The Women's Health Trial as an Investment," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 9(1), pages 59-64, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:9:y:1989:i:1:p:59-64
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8900900111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X8900900111
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X8900900111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:9:y:1989:i:1:p:59-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.