IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v8y1988i2p110-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urinary Cytology Screening

Author

Listed:
  • Leon B. Ellwein
  • George M. Farrow

Abstract

Voided-urine cytology as a screen for the early detection of urinary bladder cancer is analyzed to determine its potential in an asymptomatic population. Previous cost-effectiveness as sessments predict that screening will extend life-span at a cost-per-detected-case that is comparable to those of other cancer screening efforts. The focus here is on investigating screening from the perspective of the individual contemplating the screening decision. The analysis is based on a computerized model of bladder cancer which integrates a Markov representation of the induction and progression of the disease with algorithms representing diagnostic and therapeutic intervention strategies, intervention effectiveness, and cost. It is shown that the utilities, as well as the probabilities, of true-positive, false-positive, and false- negative screening outcomes are affected by the particular testing regimen employed and the age at which screening takes place. Screening at age 55 or age 65 was analyzed for individuals of normal risk. Analyses predict that the predisposition of cytology screening to identify the high-grade, aggressive form of the disease will result in gains in life expectancy of more than three years for the asymptomatic true-positive case. Results support the decision to screen, and by requiring a repeatedly positive test result, the probability of a false-positive outcome will not exceed that of a true-positive outcome at age 65. Except for the risk of a false-positive outcome, cytology screening compares favorably with what could theoretically be obtained if a 100% accurate screening test were available. Key words: cytology screening; decision analysis; disease modeling; bladder cancer. (Med Decis Making 8:110-119,1988)

Suggested Citation

  • Leon B. Ellwein & George M. Farrow, 1988. "Urinary Cytology Screening," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 8(2), pages 110-119, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:2:p:110-119
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X8800800207
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X8800800207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:2:p:110-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.