IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v8y1988i1p48-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data Assessing the Usefulness of screening Obstetrical Ultrasonography for Detecting Fetal and Placental Abnormalities in Uncomplicated Pregnancy

Author

Listed:
  • Theodore C.M. Li
  • Robert A. Greenes
  • Monica Weisberg
  • Doris Millan
  • Margaret Flatley
  • Lee Goldman

Abstract

To investigate the usefulness of screening in low-risk populations, the authors evaluated the yield of ultrasonography for detecting abnormalities in 678 clinically uncomplicated preg nancies. The yield of ultrasonography in high-risk women who were referred for amniocen tesis was remarkably similar to the yield in other women. All four diagnoses of twins were correct, but overall only six of 12 initial ultrasound diagnoses of fetal demise or fetal anomalies were confirmed at delivery. Of the eight major fetal anomalies present at delivery, including two cases of Down's syndrome, three had been detected by ultrasonography; none of the nine minor anomalies had been detected, usually because they were too small or might be detectable only at a later gestational age. Although ultrasonography may have a nearly perfect predictive value for certain anomalies, on average, in this study, positive ultrason ography increased the probability of an adverse outcome of pregnancy from 5.3% to 36%, while a normal ultrasound examination decreased the probability to 4.4%. These data, which emphasize the implications of screening a low-risk population, suggest that recommendations regarding routine screening obstetrical ultrasonography should await sufficiently large con trolled trials demonstrating consistent clinical benefit, in terms of reassurance or of providing a baseline for future comparison or in terms of improved outcome at a reasonable cost. Key words: ultrasonography; fetal anomaly; screening. (Med Decis Making 8:48-54, 1988)

Suggested Citation

  • Theodore C.M. Li & Robert A. Greenes & Monica Weisberg & Doris Millan & Margaret Flatley & Lee Goldman, 1988. "Data Assessing the Usefulness of screening Obstetrical Ultrasonography for Detecting Fetal and Placental Abnormalities in Uncomplicated Pregnancy," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 8(1), pages 48-54, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:1:p:48-54
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X8800800107
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X8800800107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ann Rudinow Sætnan, 2000. "To Screen or Not to Screen? Science Discourse in Two Health Policy Controversies, As Seen through Three Approaches to the Citation Evidence," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 48(3), pages 307-344, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:1:p:48-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.