IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v8y1988i1p40-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Fracture in Patients with Acute MusculosKeletal Ankle Trauma

Author

Listed:
  • Paula Diehr
  • Robert Highley
  • Farideh Dehkordi
  • Robert Wood
  • Leigh Krueger
  • Carol Teitz
  • Bonnie Hermanson

Abstract

X-rays taken for ankle trauma contribute significantly to the cost of health care in this country. In an attempt to find clinical correlates of ankle fracture 36 detailed historical and physical examination variables were collected from 587 consecutive patients with ankle trauma, and ankle x-rays were taken of all patients. The association of each variable with the final diagnosis of fracture, rupture, or sprain was tested; 21 variables were significant predictors of fracture (vs. sprain and rupture) and 15 were not significantly associated with final di agnosis. The variables were used in a linear discriminant analysis to develop a rule which would predict the final diagnosis. If only those patients predicted by the rule to have fractures had been x-rayed, all patients with fracture would have been identified but more than a fourth of all ankle trauma patients would have been spared x-rays. This compares favorably with a recently published rule that did not assess sensitivity. A simulated prospective evaluation suggests that these results are stable, but that up to 10% of the fractures could be missed on the first visit. Although current practice is not well documented, it appears that use of this rule could yield substantial cost savings. Key words: linear discriminant analysis; diagnosis; ankle trauma; fractures. (Med Decis Making 8:40-47, 1988)

Suggested Citation

  • Paula Diehr & Robert Highley & Farideh Dehkordi & Robert Wood & Leigh Krueger & Carol Teitz & Bonnie Hermanson, 1988. "Prediction of Fracture in Patients with Acute MusculosKeletal Ankle Trauma," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 8(1), pages 40-47, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:1:p:40-47
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X8800800106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X8800800106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria G.M. Hunink & Douglas K. Richardson & Peter M. Doubilet & Colin B. Begg, 1990. "Testing for Fetal Pulmonary Maturity," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 10(3), pages 201-211, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:1:p:40-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.