Author
Listed:
- Eva A. Enns
(Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
- Zongbo Li
(Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
- Shannon B. McKearnan
(Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
- Szu-Yu Zoe Kao
(Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
- Erinn C. Sanstead
(Division of Health Policy, Minnesota Department of Health, State of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA)
- Alisha Baines Simon
(Division of Health Policy, Minnesota Department of Health, State of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA)
- Pamela J. Mink
(Division of Health Policy, Minnesota Department of Health, State of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA)
- Stefan Gildemeister
(Division of Health Policy, Minnesota Department of Health, State of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA)
- Karen M. Kuntz
(Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
Abstract
Background Mathematical models served a critical role in COVID-19 decision making throughout the pandemic. Model calibration is an essential, but often computationally burdensome, step in model development that provides estimates for difficult-to-measure parameters and establishes an up-to-date modeling platform for scenario analysis. In the evolving COVID-19 pandemic, frequent recalibration was necessary to provide ongoing support to decision makers. In this study, we address the computational challenges of frequent recalibration with a new calibration approach. Methods We calibrated and recalibrated an age-stratified dynamic compartmental model of COVID-19 in Minnesota to statewide COVID-19 cumulative mortality and prevalent age-specific hospitalizations from March 22, 2020 through August 20, 2021. This period was divided into 10 calibration periods, reflecting significant changes in policies, messaging, and/or epidemiological conditions in Minnesota. When recalibrating the model from one period to the next, we employed a sequential calibration approach that leveraged calibration results from previous periods and adjusted only parameters most relevant to the calibration target data of the new calibration period to improve computational efficiency. We compared computational burden and performance of the sequential calibration approach to a more traditional calibration method, in which all parameters were readjusted with each recalibration. Results Both calibration methods identified parameter sets closely reproducing prevalent hospitalizations and cumulative deaths over time. By the last calibration period, both approaches converged to similar parameter values. However, the sequential calibration approach identified parameter sets that more tightly fit calibration targets and required substantially less computation time than traditional calibration. Conclusions Sequential calibration is an efficient approach to maintaining up-to-date models with evolving, time-varying parameters and potentially identifies better-fitting parameter sets than traditional calibration. Highlights This study used a sequential calibration approach, which takes advantage of previous calibration results to reduce the number of parameters to be estimated in each round of calibration, improving computational efficiency and algorithm convergence to best-fitting parameter values. Both sequential and traditional calibration approaches were able to identify parameter sets that closely reproduced calibration targets. However, the sequential calibration approach generated parameter sets that yielded tighter fits and was less computationally burdensome. Sequential calibration is an efficient approach to maintaining up-to-date models with evolving, time-varying parameters.
Suggested Citation
Eva A. Enns & Zongbo Li & Shannon B. McKearnan & Szu-Yu Zoe Kao & Erinn C. Sanstead & Alisha Baines Simon & Pamela J. Mink & Stefan Gildemeister & Karen M. Kuntz, 2025.
"A Sequential Calibration Approach to Address Challenges of Repeated Calibration of a COVID-19 Model,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 45(1), pages 3-16, January.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:3-16
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241292012
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:3-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.