IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v44y2024i8p927-943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical Maximizing Orientation and the Desire for Low-Value Screening: An Examination of Mediating Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Soela Kim

Abstract

Background Medical maximizing orientation is a stable, traitlike inclination to actively use health care, often associated with pursuing low-value care. Despite attempts to reduce the overuse of low-value care by targeting this orientation directly, such interventions have not always been effective. To design effective interventions to reduce the overuse of low-value care, it is critical to understand the underlying mechanisms that govern the impact of medical maximizing orientation. Objective To examine whether risk perception (deliberative, affective, and experiential) and knowledge of the benefits and harms of low-value screening mediate the potential impact of medical maximizing orientation on attitudes toward screening uptake and screening decisions. Methods A secondary analysis was conducted on data from a Web-based experiment examining various communication tactics in an information booklet regarding low-value thyroid ultrasonography among South Korean women ( N  = 492). Multiple linear, zero-inflated negative binomial and multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine the relationships between medical maximizing orientation and other study variables. A mediation analysis was performed to test mediating mechanisms. Results Medical maximizing orientation was associated with an increased positive attitude toward screening uptake and a lower likelihood of deciding not to get screened or being uncertain regarding screening decisions (relative to deciding to get screened). Knowledge and affective risk perception partially mediated the relationship between medical maximizing orientation and positive attitudes. Knowledge, deliberative, and affective risk perceptions partially mediated the relationship between medical maximizing orientation and the screening decision. Conclusions Interventions should prioritize targeting more amenable factors arising from medical maximizing orientation, such as inflated risk perceptions, particularly affective risk perception, and limited comprehension or acceptance of information about the benefits and risks associated with low-value care. Highlights This study demonstrated that people’s medical maximizing orientation can increase their positive attitudes toward the uptake of low-value screening and make them more likely to undergo it. This can happen both directly and indirectly by decreasing their understanding of the benefits and risks of screening and increasing their perception of disease risk. The study suggests that to effectively mitigate the excessive utilization of low-value care through patient-centered interventions, it is crucial to tackle 2 key issues associated with a medical maximizing mindset: inflated risk perceptions (specifically affective risk perception) and limited comprehension or acceptance of information about the benefits and risks of low-value care. This study contributes to developing a theoretical framework for interventions to improve evidence-based medical decision making by uncovering one mechanism by which medical maximizing orientation may affect the propensity to seek low-value care.

Suggested Citation

  • Soela Kim, 2024. "Medical Maximizing Orientation and the Desire for Low-Value Screening: An Examination of Mediating Mechanisms," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 44(8), pages 927-943, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:8:p:927-943
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241285009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X241285009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X241285009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:8:p:927-943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.