IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v44y2024i6p674-688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Danish Women Make Decisions about Participation in Breast Cancer Screening prior to Invitation Information: An Online Survey Using Experimental Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Eeva-Liisa Røssell

    (Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark)

  • Hilary Louise Bekker

    (Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
    Research Centre of Patient Involvement Interventions (ResCenPI), DPH, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark)

  • Mara A. Schonberg

    (Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA)

  • Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen

    (Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
    Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark)

  • Signe Borgquist

    (Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark)

  • Henrik Støvring

    (Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark)

Abstract

Introduction At mammography screening invitation, the Danish Health Authority recommends women aged 50 to 69 y make an informed decision about whether to be screened. Previous studies have shown that women have very positive attitudes about screening participation. Therefore, we hypothesized that Danish women may already have decided to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving their screening invitation at age 50 y. Methods We invited a random sample of 2,952 Danish women aged 44 to 49 y (prescreening age) to complete an online questionnaire about barriers to informed screening decision making using the official digital mailbox system in Denmark. We asked participants about their screening intentions using 3 different questions to which women were randomized: screening presented 1) as an opportunity, 2) as a choice, and 3) as an opportunity plus a question about women’s stage of decision making. All women completed questions about background characteristics, intended participation in the screening program, use and impact of screening information, and preferences for the decision-making process. Data were linked to sociodemographic register data. Results A total of 790 (26.8%) women participated in the study. Herein, 97% (95% confidence interval: 96%–98%) reported that they wanted to participate in breast cancer screening when invited at age 50 y. When presented with the choice compared with the opportunity framing, more women rejected screening. When asked about their stage of decision making, most (87%) had already made a decision about screening participation and were unlikely to change their mind. Conclusion In our study, almost all women of prescreening age wanted to participate in breast cancer screening, suggesting that providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making. Highlights Almost all women of prescreening age (44–49 y) in our study wanted to participate in the Danish national mammography screening program starting at age 50 y. Early decision making represents a barrier for informed decision making as women in this study had intentions to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving an official screening invitation, and therefore, providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making. Very few women rejected screening participation; however, more women rejected screening when the information was framed as an active choice between having or declining breast cancer screening (continue with usual care) compared with presenting only the option of screening with no description of the alternative. Two-thirds of women reading the screening information in this study had unchanged attitudes toward screening after reading the presented information.

Suggested Citation

  • Eeva-Liisa Røssell & Hilary Louise Bekker & Mara A. Schonberg & Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen & Signe Borgquist & Henrik Støvring, 2024. "Danish Women Make Decisions about Participation in Breast Cancer Screening prior to Invitation Information: An Online Survey Using Experimental Methods," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 44(6), pages 674-688, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:6:p:674-688
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241248142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X241248142
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X241248142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:6:p:674-688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.