IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v44y2024i6p617-626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Penalties for Sharing Patient Beliefs with Health Care Providers

Author

Listed:
  • Jessecae K. Marsh

    (Department of Psychology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA)

  • Onur Asan

    (School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA)

  • Samantha Kleinberg

    (Department of Computer Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA)

Abstract

Background Health care interactions may require patients to share with a physician information they believe but is incorrect. While a key piece of physicians’ work is educating their patients, people’s concerns of being seen as uninformed or incompetent by physicians may lead them to think that sharing incorrect health beliefs comes with a penalty. We tested people’s perceptions of patients who share incorrect information and how these perceptions vary by the reasonableness of the belief and its centrality to the patient’s disease. Design We recruited 399 United States Prolific.co workers (357 retained after exclusions), 200 Prolific.co workers who reported having diabetes (139 after exclusions), and 244 primary care physicians (207 after exclusions). Participants read vignettes describing patients with type 2 diabetes sharing health beliefs that were central or peripheral to the management of diabetes. Beliefs included true and incorrect statements that were reasonable or unreasonable to believe. Participants rated how a doctor would perceive the patient, the patient’s ability to manage their disease, and the patient’s trust in doctors. Results Participants rated patients who shared more unreasonable beliefs more negatively. There was an extra penalty for incorrect statements central to the patient’s diabetes management (sample 1). These results replicated for participants with type 2 diabetes (sample 2) and physician participants (sample 3). Conclusions Participants believed that patients who share incorrect information with their physicians will be penalized for their honesty. Physicians need to be educated on patients’ concerns so they can help patients disclose what may be most important for education. Highlights Understanding how people think they will be perceived in a health care setting can help us understand what they may be wary to share with their physicians. People think that patients who share incorrect beliefs will be viewed negatively. Helping patients share incorrect beliefs can improve care.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessecae K. Marsh & Onur Asan & Samantha Kleinberg, 2024. "Perceived Penalties for Sharing Patient Beliefs with Health Care Providers," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 44(6), pages 617-626, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:6:p:617-626
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241262241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X241262241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X241262241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:6:p:617-626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.