IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v44y2024i5p572-585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Health Impact of Waiting for Elective Procedures in the NHS in England: A Modeling Framework Applied to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft and Total Hip Replacement

Author

Listed:
  • Naomi Kate Gibbs

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK)

  • Susan Griffin

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK)

  • Nils Gutacker

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK)

  • Adrián Villaseñor

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK)

  • Simon Walker

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK)

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study is to demonstrate a practical framework that can be applied to estimate the health impact of changes in waiting times across a range of elective procedures in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. We apply this framework by modeling 2 procedures: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and total hip replacement (THR). Methods We built a Markov model capturing health pre- and postprocedure, including the possibility of exiting preprocedure to acute NHS care or self-funded private care. We estimate the change in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime horizon for 10 subgroups defined by sex and Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile groups and for 7 alternative scenarios. We include 18 wk as a baseline waiting time consistent with current NHS policy. The model was populated with data from routinely collected data sets where possible (Hospital Episode Statistics, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, and Office for National Statistics Mortality records), supplemented by the academic literature. Results Compared with 18 wk, increasing the wait time to 36 wk resulted in a mean discounted QALY loss in the range of 0.034 to 0.043 for CABG and 0.193 to 0.291 for THR. The QALY impact of longer NHS waits was greater for those living in more deprived areas, partly as fewer patients switch to private care. Discussion/Conclusion The proposed framework was applied to 2 different procedures and patient populations. If applied to an expanded group of procedures, it could provide decision makers with information to inform prioritization of waiting lists. There are a number of limitations in routine data on waiting for elective procedures, primarily the lack of information on people still waiting. Highlights We present a modeling framework that allows for an estimation of the health impact (measured in quality-adjusted life-years) of waiting for elective procedures in the NHS in England. We apply our model to waiting for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and total hip replacement (THR). Increasing the wait for THR results in a larger health loss than an equivalent increase in wait for CABG. This model could potentially be used to estimate the impact across an expanded group of procedures to inform prioritization of activities to reduce waiting times.

Suggested Citation

  • Naomi Kate Gibbs & Susan Griffin & Nils Gutacker & Adrián Villaseñor & Simon Walker, 2024. "The Health Impact of Waiting for Elective Procedures in the NHS in England: A Modeling Framework Applied to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft and Total Hip Replacement," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 44(5), pages 572-585, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:5:p:572-585
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241256639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X241256639
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X241256639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:5:p:572-585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.