IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v44y2024i5p543-553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emulator-Based Bayesian Calibration of the CISNET Colorectal Cancer Models

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Pineda-Antunez

    (The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA)

  • Claudia Seguin

    (Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Luuk A. van Duuren

    (Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Amy B. Knudsen

    (Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Barak Davidi

    (Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Pedro Nascimento de Lima

    (RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA)

  • Carolyn Rutter

    (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Biostatistics Program, Public Health Sciences Division, Seattle, WA, USA)

  • Karen M. Kuntz

    (Division of Health Policy & Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA)

  • Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar

    (Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Nicholson Collier

    (Decision and Infrastructure Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA
    Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA)

  • Jonathan Ozik

    (Decision and Infrastructure Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA
    Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA)

  • Fernando Alarid-Escudero

    (Department of Health Policy, School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA
    Center for Health Policy, Freeman Spogli Institute, Stanford University, CA, USA)

Abstract

Purpose To calibrate Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET)’s SimCRC, MISCAN-Colon, and CRC-SPIN simulation models of the natural history colorectal cancer (CRC) with an emulator-based Bayesian algorithm and internally validate the model-predicted outcomes to calibration targets. Methods We used Latin hypercube sampling to sample up to 50,000 parameter sets for each CISNET-CRC model and generated the corresponding outputs. We trained multilayer perceptron artificial neural networks (ANNs) as emulators using the input and output samples for each CISNET-CRC model. We selected ANN structures with corresponding hyperparameters (i.e., number of hidden layers, nodes, activation functions, epochs, and optimizer) that minimize the predicted mean square error on the validation sample. We implemented the ANN emulators in a probabilistic programming language and calibrated the input parameters with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo–based algorithms to obtain the joint posterior distributions of the CISNET-CRC models’ parameters. We internally validated each calibrated emulator by comparing the model-predicted posterior outputs against the calibration targets. Results The optimal ANN for SimCRC had 4 hidden layers and 360 hidden nodes, MISCAN-Colon had 4 hidden layers and 114 hidden nodes, and CRC-SPIN had 1 hidden layer and 140 hidden nodes. The total time for training and calibrating the emulators was 7.3, 4.0, and 0.66 h for SimCRC, MISCAN-Colon, and CRC-SPIN, respectively. The mean of the model-predicted outputs fell within the 95% confidence intervals of the calibration targets in 98 of 110 for SimCRC, 65 of 93 for MISCAN, and 31 of 41 targets for CRC-SPIN. Conclusions Using ANN emulators is a practical solution to reduce the computational burden and complexity for Bayesian calibration of individual-level simulation models used for policy analysis, such as the CISNET CRC models. In this work, we present a step-by-step guide to constructing emulators for calibrating 3 realistic CRC individual-level models using a Bayesian approach. Highlights We use artificial neural networks (ANNs) to build emulators that surrogate complex individual-based models to reduce the computational burden in the Bayesian calibration process. ANNs showed good performance in emulating the CISNET-CRC microsimulation models, despite having many input parameters and outputs. Using ANN emulators is a practical solution to reduce the computational burden and complexity for Bayesian calibration of individual-level simulation models used for policy analysis. This work aims to support health decision scientists who want to quantify the uncertainty of calibrated parameters of computationally intensive simulation models under a Bayesian framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Pineda-Antunez & Claudia Seguin & Luuk A. van Duuren & Amy B. Knudsen & Barak Davidi & Pedro Nascimento de Lima & Carolyn Rutter & Karen M. Kuntz & Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar & Nicholson Collier & , 2024. "Emulator-Based Bayesian Calibration of the CISNET Colorectal Cancer Models," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 44(5), pages 543-553, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:5:p:543-553
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241255618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X241255618
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X241255618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:5:p:543-553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.