IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v44y2024i5p529-542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Spillover Effects of Extending Liver Transplantation to Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Discrete Event Simulation Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna Meidell Sjule

    (Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway)

  • Caroline N. Vinter

    (Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway)

  • Svein Dueland

    (Research group for Transplant Oncology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway)

  • PÃ¥l-Dag Line

    (Research group for Transplant Oncology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
    Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
    Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway)

  • Emily A. Burger

    (Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
    Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)

  • Gudrun Marie Waaler Bjørnelv

    (Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
    Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Background Liver transplantation is an alternative treatment for patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer liver-only metastases (CRLM); however, the potential effects on wait-list time and life expectancy to other patients on the transplant waiting list have not been considered. We explored the potential effects of expanding liver transplantation eligibility to include patients with CRLM on wait-list time and life expectancy in Norway. Methods We developed a discrete event simulation model to reflect the Norwegian liver transplantation waiting list process and included 2 groups: 1) patients currently eligible for liver transplantation and 2) CRLM patients. Under 2 alternative CRLM-patient transplant eligibility criteria, we simulated 2 strategies: 1) inclusion of only currently eligible patients (CRLM patients received standard-of-care palliative chemotherapy) and 2) expanding waiting list eligibility to include CRLM patients under 2 eligibility criteria. Model outcomes included median waiting list time, life expectancy, and total life-years. Results For every additional CRLM patient listed per year, the overall median wait-list time, initially 52 d, increased by 8% to 11%. Adding 2 additional CRLM patients under the most restrictive eligibility criteria increased the CRLM patients’ average life expectancy by 10.64 y and decreased the average life expectancy for currently eligible patients by 0.05 y. Under these assumptions, there was a net gain of 149.61 life-years over a 10-y programmatic period, which continued to increase under scenarios of adding 10 CRLM patients to the wait-list. Health gains were lower under less restrictive CRLM eligibility criteria. For example, adding 4 additional CRLM patients under the less restrictive eligibility criteria increased the CRLM patients’ average life expectancy by 5.64 y and decreased the average life expectancy for currently eligible patients by 0.12 y. Under these assumptions, there was a net gain of 96.36 life-years over a 10-y programmatic period, which continued to increase up to 7 CRLM patients. Conclusions Our model-based analysis enabled the consideration of the potential effects of enlisting Norwegian CRLM patients for liver transplantation on wait-list time and life expectancy. Enlisting CRLM patients is expected to increase the total health effects, which supports the implementation of liver transplantation for CRLM patients in Norway. Highlights Given the Norwegian donor liver availability, adding patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer liver-only metastases (CRLM) to the liver transplantation waiting list had an overall modest, but varying, impact on total waiting list time. Survival gains for selected CRLM patients treated with liver transplantation would likely outweigh the losses incurred to patients listed currently. To improve the total life-years gained in the population, Norway should consider expanding the treatment options for CRLM patients to include liver transplantation. Other countries may also have an opportunity to gain total life-years by extending the waiting list eligibility criteria; however, country-specific analyses are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna Meidell Sjule & Caroline N. Vinter & Svein Dueland & PÃ¥l-Dag Line & Emily A. Burger & Gudrun Marie Waaler Bjørnelv, 2024. "The Spillover Effects of Extending Liver Transplantation to Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Discrete Event Simulation Analysis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 44(5), pages 529-542, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:5:p:529-542
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241249154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X241249154
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X241249154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:5:p:529-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.