IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v44y2024i2p127-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reporting Economic Evaluations with Value of Information Analyses Using the CHEERS Value of Information (CHEERS-VOI) Reporting Guideline

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Kunst

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
    Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA)

  • Annisa Siu

    (Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada)

  • Michael Drummond

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)

  • Sabine Grimm

    (Department of Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht Health Economics and Technology Assessment (Maastricht HETA) Center, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands)

  • Janneke Grutters

    (Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

  • Don Husereau

    (School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
    Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada)

  • Hendrik Koffijberg

    (Department of Health Technology & Services Research, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands)

  • Claire Rothery

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)

  • Edward C. F. Wilson

    (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK)

  • Anna Heath

    (Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
    Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
    Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Kunst & Annisa Siu & Michael Drummond & Sabine Grimm & Janneke Grutters & Don Husereau & Hendrik Koffijberg & Claire Rothery & Edward C. F. Wilson & Anna Heath, 2024. "Reporting Economic Evaluations with Value of Information Analyses Using the CHEERS Value of Information (CHEERS-VOI) Reporting Guideline," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 44(2), pages 127-128, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:127-128
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X231214791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X231214791
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X231214791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:127-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.