IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v43y2023i7-8p930-948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of the US Diabetes, Obesity, Cardiovascular Disease Microsimulation (DOC-M) Model: Health Disparity and Economic Impact Model

Author

Listed:
  • David D. Kim

    (Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA)

  • Lu Wang

    (Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Brianna N. Lauren

    (Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Junxiu Liu

    (Department of Population Health Science and Policy, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA)

  • Matti Marklund

    (The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA)

  • Yujin Lee

    (Department of Food and Nutrition, Myongji University, Yongin, South Korea)

  • Renata Micha

    (Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Dariush Mozaffarian

    (Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA)

  • John B. Wong

    (Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA)

Abstract

Background Few simulation models have incorporated the interplay of diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease (CVD); their upstream lifestyle and biological risk factors; and their downstream effects on health disparities and economic consequences. Methods We developed and validated a US Diabetes, Obesity, Cardiovascular Disease Microsimulation (DOC-M) model that incorporates demographic, clinical, and lifestyle risk factors to jointly predict overall and racial-ethnic groups-specific obesity, diabetes, CVD, and cause-specific mortality for the US adult population aged 40 to 79 y at baseline. An individualized health care cost prediction model was further developed and integrated. This model incorporates nationally representative data on baseline demographics, lifestyle, health, and cause-specific mortality; dynamic changes in modifiable risk factors over time; and parameter uncertainty using probabilistic distributions. Validation analyses included assessment of 1) population-level risk calibration and 2) individual-level risk discrimination. To illustrate the application of the DOC-M model, we evaluated the long-term cost-effectiveness of a national produce prescription program. Results Comparing the 15-y model-predicted population risk of primary outcomes among the 2001–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cohort with the observed prevalence from age-matched cross-sectional 2003–2016 NHANES cohorts, calibration performance was strong based on observed-to-expected ratio and calibration plot analysis. In most cases, Brier scores fell below 0.0004, indicating a low overall prediction error. Using the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohorts, the c-statistics for assessing individual-level risk discrimination were 0.85 to 0.88 for diabetes, 0.93 to 0.95 for obesity, 0.74 to 0.76 for CVD history, and 0.78 to 0.81 for all-cause mortality, both overall and in three racial-ethnic groups. Open-source code for the model was posted at https://github.com/food-price/DOC-M-Model-Development-and-Validation . Conclusions The validated DOC-M model can be used to examine health, equity, and the economic impact of health policies and interventions on behavioral and clinical risk factors for obesity, diabetes, and CVD. Highlights We developed a novel microsimula’tion model for obesity, diabetes, and CVD, which intersect together and – critically for prevention and treatment interventions – share common lifestyle, biologic, and demographic risk factors. Validation analyses, including assessment of (1) population-level risk calibration and (2) individual-level risk discrimination, showed strong performance across the overall population and three major racial-ethnic groups for 6 outcomes (obesity, diabetes, CVD, and all-cause mortality, CVD- and DM-cause mortality) This paper provides a thorough explanation and documentation of the development and validation process of a novel microsimulation model, along with the open-source code (https://github.com/food-price/ DOCM_validation) for public use, to serve as a guide for future simulation model assessments, validation, and implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • David D. Kim & Lu Wang & Brianna N. Lauren & Junxiu Liu & Matti Marklund & Yujin Lee & Renata Micha & Dariush Mozaffarian & John B. Wong, 2023. "Development and Validation of the US Diabetes, Obesity, Cardiovascular Disease Microsimulation (DOC-M) Model: Health Disparity and Economic Impact Model," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 43(7-8), pages 930-948, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:43:y:2023:i:7-8:p:930-948
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X231196916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X231196916
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X231196916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen A. Dakin & José Leal & Andrew Briggs & Philip Clarke & Rury R. Holman & Alastair Gray, 2020. "Accurately Reflecting Uncertainty When Using Patient-Level Simulation Models to Extrapolate Clinical Trial Data," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(4), pages 460-473, May.
    2. Ankur Pandya & Stephen Sy & Sylvia Cho & Sartaj Alam & Milton C. Weinstein & Thomas A. Gaziano, 2017. "Validation of a Cardiovascular Disease Policy Microsimulation Model Using Both Survival and Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(7), pages 802-814, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duncan Ermini Leaf & Bryan Tysinger & Dana P. Goldman & Darius N. Lakdawalla, 2021. "Predicting quantity and quality of life with the Future Elderly Model," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(S1), pages 52-79, November.
    2. Dixon, Padraig & Harrison, Sean & Hollingworth, William & Davies, Neil M. & Davey Smith, George, 2022. "Estimating the causal effect of liability to disease on healthcare costs using Mendelian Randomization," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    3. Marina Antoniou & Céu Mateus & Bruce Hollingsworth & Andrew Titman, 2024. "A Systematic Review of Methodologies Used in Models of the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 19-40, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:43:y:2023:i:7-8:p:930-948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.