IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v43y2023i4p498-507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Qualitative Exploration of General Practitioners’ Treatment Decision-Making for Depressive Symptoms

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Stallman

    (School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia)

  • Nicola Sheeran

    (School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia)

  • Mark Boschen

    (School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia)

Abstract

Background General practitioners (GPs) provide the most antidepressant prescriptions and psychologist referrals in Australia, yet little is known about how they decide between treatments for depressive symptoms. Aims This study examined the decision cues that GPs use when deciding how to treat depressive symptoms and the meaning they attribute to these associations. Methods Structured interviews were conducted with 16 Australian GPs in a “think-aloud†verbal protocol analysis format. The transcripts were analyzed using content coding and thematic analysis, informed by the dual processes model of decision making. Results Participants associated prescribing antidepressants with severe depressive symptoms, and psychologist referrals were the preferred initial treatment provided patients were willing to engage. Four main themes emerged from the thematic analysis: 1) psychologist as default, 2) the risk is just too high, 3) medication as supplement , and 4) drivers of antidepressants. Contrary to previous findings, participants identified a strong heuristic association between depressive symptoms and psychologist referral. Antidepressant prescription was associated with severe symptoms, higher risk, and a cluster of cues that lead them away from psychologist referral. Conclusions Participants demonstrated an oversensitivity to depressive symptom severity, associating psychologist referrals with subclinical depressive symptoms, and starting antidepressants for suicidal ideation and significant functional decline. Highlights Psychologist referrals were the default preference for GPs when treating depressive symptoms, whereas antidepressants were reserved for patients with elevated risk from severe depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. Participants’ conceptualization of depression severity was oversensitive compared with treatment guidelines. Contrary to treatment guidelines, GPs in this study demonstrated their discomfort for referring patients with suicidal ideation to a psychologist without initiating antidepressants. GPs should consider whether patients within their mild to moderate assessment range can be treated exclusively with more cost-effective means than psychological therapy such as e-mental health programs, guided self-help, and lifestyle changes alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Stallman & Nicola Sheeran & Mark Boschen, 2023. "A Qualitative Exploration of General Practitioners’ Treatment Decision-Making for Depressive Symptoms," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 43(4), pages 498-507, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:43:y:2023:i:4:p:498-507
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X231166009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X231166009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X231166009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lutfey, Karen E. & Campbell, Stephen M. & Renfrew, Megan R. & Marceau, Lisa D. & Roland, Martin & McKinlay, John B., 2008. "How are patient characteristics relevant for physicians' clinical decision making in diabetes? An analysis of qualitative results from a cross-national factorial experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1391-1399, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Fumarco & Benjamin Harrell & Patrick Button & David Schwegman & E Dils, 2020. "Gender Identity, Race, and Ethnicity-based Discrimination in Access to Mental Health Care: Evidence from an Audit Correspondence Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 28164, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Gage-Bouchard, Elizabeth A., 2017. "Social support, flexible resources, and health care navigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 111-118.
    3. Elstad, Emily A. & Lutfey, Karen E. & Marceau, Lisa D. & Campbell, Stephen M. & von dem Knesebeck, Olaf & McKinlay, John B., 2010. "What do physicians gain (and lose) with experience? Qualitative results from a cross-national study of diabetes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1728-1736, June.
    4. Puckett, Cassidy & Wong, Jenise C. & Daley, Tanicia C. & Cossen, Kristina, 2020. "How organizations shape medical technology allocation: Insulin pumps and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Lay-Yee, Roy & Scott, Alastair & Davis, Peter, 2013. "Patterns of family doctor decision making in practice context. What are the implications for medical practice variation and social disparities?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 47-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:43:y:2023:i:4:p:498-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.