IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v42y2022i6p776-782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical Decision Style and COVID-19 Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Gustav Tinghög

    (Department of Management and Engineering, Division of Economics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
    National Center for Health Care Priority Setting, The Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden)

  • Liam Strand

    (National Center for Health Care Priority Setting, The Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden)

Abstract

Given the flood of health-related information stirred up by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is important to understand the factors that influence people to engage in protective public health measures so that medical communication can be tailored to be effective. Following the idea that people have a general inclination toward health care utilization, which is either more passive (i.e., medical minimizer) or more aggressive (i.e., medical maximizer), we assess if this inclination extends to being more or less willing to engage in protective public health behavior. We investigate the effect of individual differences in medical minimizing and medical maximizing orientation on COVID-19–related protective behaviors and attitudes. We used the validated Medical Maximizer-Minimizer Scale (MMS) and surveyed a diverse opt-in sample of the Swedish population ( n = 806). Our results show that the MMS significantly predicts a wide range of self-reported behaviors and attitudes in relation to COVID-19. Participants with a stronger minimization orientation were significantly less likely to practice social distancing, follow hygiene recommendations, and be supportive of strict COVID-19 policies. Participants with a stronger maximization orientation had a larger discrepancy between perceived own risk and others getting infected. Thus, they perceived themselves as being less at risk for getting infected compared to the average person. Our findings imply that the MMS can be effectively used to predict who is more or less reluctant to follow public health recommendations. JEL codes : D70 E71 I12 I18

Suggested Citation

  • Gustav Tinghög & Liam Strand, 2022. "Medical Decision Style and COVID-19 Behavior," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 42(6), pages 776-782, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:42:y:2022:i:6:p:776-782
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X221079354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X221079354
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X221079354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    COVID-19; Medical Maximizer-Minimizer Scale; survey; social distancing; hygienic behavior;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • E71 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on the Macro Economy
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:42:y:2022:i:6:p:776-782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.