IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v41y2021i8p1017-1032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Contact-Tracing Policies against the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Austria: An Agent-Based Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Bicher

    (TU Wien, Institute for Information Systems Engineering, Vienna, Austria
    dwh simulation services, dwh GmbH, Vienna, Austria)

  • Claire Rippinger

    (dwh simulation services, dwh GmbH, Vienna, Austria)

  • Christoph Urach

    (dwh simulation services, dwh GmbH, Vienna, Austria)

  • Dominik Brunmeir

    (dwh simulation services, dwh GmbH, Vienna, Austria)

  • Uwe Siebert

    (UMIT–University for Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Hall in Tirol, Austria
    Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
    Harvard Medical School, Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Niki Popper

    (TU Wien, Institute for Information Systems Engineering, Vienna, Austria
    DEXHELPP Society of Decision Support for Health Policy and Planning, Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Background Many countries have already gone through several infection waves and mostly managed to successfully stop the exponential spread of SARS-CoV-2 through bundles of restrictive measures. Still, the danger of further waves of infections is omnipresent, and it is apparent that every containment policy must be carefully evaluated and possibly replaced by a different, less restrictive policy before it can be lifted. Tracing of contacts and consequential breaking of infection chains is a promising strategy to help contain the disease, although its precise impact on the epidemic is unknown. Objective In this work, we aim to quantify the impact of tracing on the containment of the disease and investigate the dynamic effects involved. Design We developed an agent-based model that validly depicts the spread of the disease and allows for exploratory analysis of containment policies. We applied this model to quantify the impact of different approaches of contact tracing in Austria to derive general conclusions on contract tracing. Results The study displays that strict tracing complements other intervention strategies. For the containment of the disease, the number of secondary infections must be reduced by about 75%. Implementing the proposed tracing strategy supplements measures worth about 5%. Evaluation of the number of preventively quarantined persons shows that household quarantine is the most effective in terms of avoided cases per quarantined person. Limitations The results are limited by the validity of the modeling assumptions, model parameter estimates, and the quality of the parametrization data. Conclusions The study shows that tracing is indeed an efficient measure to keep case numbers low but comes at a high price if the disease is not well contained. Therefore, contact tracing must be executed strictly, and adherence within the population must be held up to prevent uncontrolled outbreaks of the disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Bicher & Claire Rippinger & Christoph Urach & Dominik Brunmeir & Uwe Siebert & Niki Popper, 2021. "Evaluation of Contact-Tracing Policies against the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Austria: An Agent-Based Simulation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(8), pages 1017-1032, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:8:p:1017-1032
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211013306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X211013306
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X211013306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:8:p:1017-1032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.