Author
Listed:
- Annebel ten Broeke
(Councyl, Delft, Netherlands)
- Jan Hulscher
(Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands)
- Nicolaas Heyning
(Councyl, Delft, Netherlands)
- Elisabeth Kooi
(University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Kinder Ziekenhuis, Division of Neonatology, Groningen, Netherlands)
- Caspar Chorus
(Councyl, Delft, Netherlands
Faculty Technology Policy and Management, Department of Engineering Systems and Services, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands)
Abstract
We present a novel way to codify medical expertise and to make it available to support medical decision making. Our approach is based on econometric techniques (known as conjoint analysis or discrete choice theory) developed to analyze and forecast consumer or patient behavior; we reconceptualize these techniques and put them to use to generate an explainable, tractable decision support system for medical experts. The approach works as follows: using choice experiments containing systematically composed hypothetical choice scenarios, we collect a set of expert decisions. Then we use those decisions to estimate the weights that experts implicitly assign to various decision factors. The resulting choice model is able to generate a probabilistic assessment for real-life decision situations, in combination with an explanation of which factors led to the assessment. The approach has several advantages, but also potential limitations, compared to rule-based methods and machine learning techniques. We illustrate the choice model approach to support medical decision making by applying it in the context of the difficult choice to proceed to surgery v. comfort care for a critically ill neonate.
Suggested Citation
Annebel ten Broeke & Jan Hulscher & Nicolaas Heyning & Elisabeth Kooi & Caspar Chorus, 2021.
"BAIT: A New Medical Decision Support Technology Based on Discrete Choice Theory,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(5), pages 614-619, July.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:5:p:614-619
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211001320
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:5:p:614-619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.