IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v41y2021i5p597-606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Takeru Shiroiwa

    (Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health (C2H), National Institute of Public Health, Wako, Saitama, Japan)

  • Shunya Ikeda

    (Department of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Chiba, Japan)

  • Shinichi Noto

    (Department of Health Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan)

  • Takashi Fukuda

    (Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health (C2H), National Institute of Public Health, Wako, Saitama, Japan)

  • Elly Stolk

    (EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Background EQ-5D-Y is a preference-based measure for children and adolescents (aged 8–15 y). This is the first study to develop an EQ-5D-Y value set for converting EQ-5D-Y responses to index values. Methods We recruited 1047 respondents (aged 20–79 y) from the general population, stratified by gender and age group, in 5 Japanese cities. All data were collected through face-to-face surveys. Respondents were asked to value EQ-5D-Y states for a hypothetical 10-y-old child from a proxy perspective using composite time tradeoff (cTTO) and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The discrete choice data were analyzed using a mixed logit model. Latent DCE values were then converted to a 0 (death)/1 (full health) scale by mapping them to the cTTO values. Results The mean observed cTTO value of the worst health state [33333] was 0.20. Analysis of the DCE data showed that the coefficients of the domains related to mental functions (“Having pain or discomfort†and “Feeling worried, sad, or unhappy†) were larger than those for the domains related to physical and social functions. By converting latent DCE values to a utility scale, we constructed a value set for EQ-5D-Y. No inconsistencies were observed. The minimum predicted score was 0.288 [33333], and the second-best score was 0.957 [12111]. Conclusion A value set for EQ-5D-Y was successfully constructed. This is the first survey of an EQ-5D-Y value set. Interpreting the differences between EQ-5D-Y and EQ-5D-5L value sets is a future task with implications for health care policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Takeru Shiroiwa & Shunya Ikeda & Shinichi Noto & Takashi Fukuda & Elly Stolk, 2021. "Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(5), pages 597-606, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:5:p:597-606
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211001859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X211001859
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X211001859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:5:p:597-606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.