IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v41y2021i5p540-549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shared Decision Making Tools for People Facing Stroke Prevention Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Environmental Scan

Author

Listed:
  • Victor D. Torres Roldan

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Sarah R. Brand-McCarthy

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
    Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Oscar J. Ponce

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Tereza Belluzzo

    (General Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Medical Faculty of Hradec Králové, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic)

  • Meritxell Urtecho

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Nataly R. Espinoza Suarez

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Freddy J. K. Toloza

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Anjali D. Thota

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Paige W. Organick

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Francisco Barrera

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
    Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), School of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico)

  • Carolina Liu-Sanchez

    (School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru)

  • Soumya Jaladi

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Larry Prokop

    (Department of Library-Public Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA)

  • Elissa M. Ozanne

    (Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA)

  • Angela Fagerlin

    (Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
    Salt Lake City VA Informatics Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center for Innovation)

  • Ian G. Hargraves

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Peter A. Noseworthy

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Victor M. Montori

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Juan P. Brito

    (Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

Abstract

Objective Shared decision making (SDM) tools can help implement guideline recommendations for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) considering stroke prevention strategies. We sought to characterize all available SDM tools for this purpose and examine their quality and clinical impact. Methods We searched through multiple bibliographic databases, social media, and an SDM tool repository from inception to May 2020 and contacted authors of identified SDM tools. Eligible tools had to offer information about warfarin and ≥1 direct oral anticoagulant. We extracted tool characteristics, assessed their adherence to the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, and obtained information about their efficacy in promoting SDM. Results We found 14 SDM tools. Most tools provided up-to-date information about the options, but very few included practical considerations (e.g., out-of-pocket cost). Five of these SDM tools, all used by patients prior to the encounter, were tested in trials at high risk of bias and were found to produce small improvements in patient knowledge and reductions in decisional conflict. Conclusion Several SDM tools for stroke prevention in AF are available, but whether they promote high-quality SDM is yet to be known. The implementation of guidelines for SDM in this context requires user-centered development and evaluation of SDM tools that can effectively promote high-quality SDM and improve stroke prevention in patients with AF.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor D. Torres Roldan & Sarah R. Brand-McCarthy & Oscar J. Ponce & Tereza Belluzzo & Meritxell Urtecho & Nataly R. Espinoza Suarez & Freddy J. K. Toloza & Anjali D. Thota & Paige W. Organick & Franc, 2021. "Shared Decision Making Tools for People Facing Stroke Prevention Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Environmental Scan," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(5), pages 540-549, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:5:p:540-549
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211005655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X211005655
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X211005655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:5:p:540-549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.