Author
Listed:
- Antonius Schneider
(TUM School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Kompetenzzentrum Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin Bayern (KWAB), Erlangen, Germany)
- Markus Bühner
(Institute of Psychological Methods and Diagnostics, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany)
- Therese Herzog
(TUM School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Kompetenzzentrum Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin Bayern (KWAB), Erlangen, Germany)
- Siona Laverty
(TUM School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Kompetenzzentrum Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin Bayern (KWAB), Erlangen, Germany)
- Stefanie Ziehfreund
(TUM School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Kompetenzzentrum Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin Bayern (KWAB), Erlangen, Germany)
- Alexander Hapfelmeier
(TUM School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
TUM School of Medicine, Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany)
- Dagmar Schneider
(Kompetenzzentrum Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin Bayern (KWAB), Erlangen, Germany
Koordinierungsstelle Allgemeinmedizin, Munich, Germany)
- Pascal O. Berberat
(TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany)
- Marco Roos
(Kompetenzzentrum Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin Bayern (KWAB), Erlangen, Germany
Institute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany)
Abstract
Objective Dealing with uncertainty is a core competence for physicians. To evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on family medicine residents’ (FMRs’) intention to request diagnostic tests and their attitudes toward uncertainty. Methods Nonrandomized controlled trial. Intervention group (IG) FMRs participated in interactive “dealing with uncertainty†seminars comprising statistical lessons and diagnostic reasoning. Control group (CG) FMRs participated in seminars without in-depth diagnostic lessons. FMRs completed the Dealing with Uncertainty Questionnaire (DUQ), comprising the Diagnostic Action and Diagnostic Reasoning scales. The Physicians’ Reaction to Uncertainty (PRU) questionnaire, comprising 4 scales (Anxiety Due to Uncertainty, Concern about Bad Outcomes, Reluctance to Disclose Uncertainty to Patients, and Reluctance to Disclose Mistakes to Physicians) was also completed. Follow-up was performed 3 months later. Differences were calculated with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results In total, 107 FMRs of the IG and 102 FMRs of the CG participated at baseline and follow-up. The mean (SD) Diagnostic Action scale score decreased from 24.0 (4.8) to 22.9 (5.1) in the IG and increased in the CG from 23.7 (5.4) to 24.1 (5.4), showing significant group difference ( P = 0.006). The Diagnostic Reasoning scale increased significantly ( P = 0.025) without a significant group difference ( P = 0.616), from 19.2 (2.6) to 19.7 (2.4) in the IG and from 18.1 (3.3) to 18.8 (3.2) in the CG. The PRU scale Anxiety Due to Uncertainty decreased significantly ( P = 0.029) without a significant group difference ( P = 0.116), from 20.5 (4.8) to 18.5 (5.5) in the IG and from 19.9 (5.5) to 19.0 (6.0) in the CG. Conclusion The structured seminar reduced self-rated diagnostic test requisition. The change in Anxiety Due to Uncertainty and Diagnostic Reasoning might be due to an unspecific accompanying effect of the extra-occupational seminars for residents.
Suggested Citation
Antonius Schneider & Markus Bühner & Therese Herzog & Siona Laverty & Stefanie Ziehfreund & Alexander Hapfelmeier & Dagmar Schneider & Pascal O. Berberat & Marco Roos, 2021.
"Educational Intervention Reduced Family Medicine Residents’ Intention to Request Diagnostic Tests: Results of a Controlled Trial,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(3), pages 329-339, April.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:3:p:329-339
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X21989692
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:3:p:329-339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.