IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v40y2020i7p912-923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Including Costs and Outcomes of Dementia in a Health Economic Model to Evaluate Lifestyle Interventions to Prevent Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease

Author

Listed:
  • Penny Breeze

    (School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK)

  • Chloe Thomas

    (School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK)

  • Praveen Thokala

    (School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK)

  • Louise Lafortune

    (Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK)

  • Carol Brayne

    (Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK)

  • Alan Brennan

    (School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK)

Abstract

Objectives Economic evaluations of lifestyle interventions, which aim to prevent diabetes/cardiovascular disease (CVD), have not included dementia. Lifestyle interventions decrease dementia risk and extend life expectancy, leading to competing effects on health care costs. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility of including dementia in a public health cost-effectiveness analysis and quantify the overall impacts accounting for these competing effects. Methods The School for Public Health Research (SPHR) diabetes prevention model describes individuals’ risk of type 2 diabetes, microvascular outcomes, CVD, congestive heart failure, cancer, osteoarthritis, depression, and mortality in England. In version 3.1, we adapted the model to include dementia using published data from primary care databases, health surveys, and trials of dementia to describe dementia incidence, diagnosis, and disease progression. We estimate the impact of dementia on lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained of the National Health Service diabetes prevention program (NHS DPP) from an NHS/personal social services perspective with 3 scenarios: 1) no dementia, 2) dementia only, and 3) reduced dementia risk. Subgroup, parameter, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results The lifetime cost savings of the NHS DPP per patient were £145 in the no-dementia scenario, £121 in the dementia-only scenario, and £167 in the reduced dementia risk scenario. The QALY gains increased by 0.0006 in dementia only and 0.0134 in reduced dementia risk. Dementia did not alter the recommendation that the NHS/DPP is cost-effective. Conclusions Including dementia into a model of lifestyle interventions was feasible but did not change policy recommendations or modify health economic outcomes. The impact on health economic outcomes was largest where a direct impact on dementia incidence was assumed, particularly in elderly populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Penny Breeze & Chloe Thomas & Praveen Thokala & Louise Lafortune & Carol Brayne & Alan Brennan, 2020. "The Impact of Including Costs and Outcomes of Dementia in a Health Economic Model to Evaluate Lifestyle Interventions to Prevent Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(7), pages 912-923, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:40:y:2020:i:7:p:912-923
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X20946758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X20946758
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X20946758?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:40:y:2020:i:7:p:912-923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.