IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v39y2019i6p673-680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Three Measures of Shared Decision Making: SDM Process_4, CollaboRATE, and SURE Scales

Author

Listed:
  • Suzanne Brodney

    (Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Floyd J. Fowler Jr

    (Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Michael J. Barry

    (Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Yuchiao Chang

    (Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Karen Sepucha

    (Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA)

Abstract

Objective. If shared decision making (SDM) is to be part of quality assessment, it is necessary to have good measures of SDM. The purpose of this study is to compare the psychometric performance of 3 short patient-reported measures of SDM. Methods. Patients who met with a specialist to discuss possible surgery for hip or knee osteoarthritis (hips/knees), lumbar herniated disc, or lumbar spinal stenosis (backs) were surveyed shortly after the visit and again 6 months later. Some of the patients saw a patient decision aid (PDA) prior to the meeting. The 3 SDM measures were the SDM Process_4 (SDMP) survey, CollaboRATE, and SURE scale. The follow-up survey included measures of decision regret, satisfaction, and decision quality. Results. Patients in the sample ( N = 649) had a mean age of 63.3 years, 51% were female, 60% were college educated, and there were more hip/knee patients than back patients (69% v. 31%). Forty-nine percent had surgery. For hips/knees, the SDMP and SURE scores were significantly associated with viewing all of the PDA compared with those who did not ( P

Suggested Citation

  • Suzanne Brodney & Floyd J. Fowler Jr & Michael J. Barry & Yuchiao Chang & Karen Sepucha, 2019. "Comparison of Three Measures of Shared Decision Making: SDM Process_4, CollaboRATE, and SURE Scales," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(6), pages 673-680, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:39:y:2019:i:6:p:673-680
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19855951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X19855951
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X19855951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    shared decision making;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:39:y:2019:i:6:p:673-680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.